ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025
DeepCCDS: Interpretable Deep Learning Framework for Predicting Cancer Cell Drug Sensitivity through Characterizing Cancer Driver Signals.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Essentiality-driven prediction of anticancer drug responses in preclinical and clinical contexts.iScience · 2026Article
- Interpretable graph deep learning framework for drug synergy prediction by integrating functional and clinical similarities.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- AI-genomics synergy for drug repurposing in breast cancer: an interpretability-driven framework.NPJ genomic medicine · 2026Review
- Graph neural networks for multi-scale gene-drug interaction modeling in cancer: applications, challenges, and therapeutic opportunities for breast cancer drug resistance.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- DeepCCDS: Interpretable Deep Learning Framework for Predicting Cancer Cell Drug Sensitivity through Characterizing Cancer Driver Signals.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate characterization of cellular states is the foundation for precise prediction of drug sensitivity in cancer cell lines, which in turn is fundamental to realizing precision oncology. However, current deep learning approaches have limitations in characterizing cellular states. They rely solely on isolated genetic markers, overlooking the complex regulatory networks and cellular mechanisms that underlie drug responses. To address this limitation, this work proposes DeepCCDS, a Deep learning framework for Cancer Cell Drug Sensitivity prediction through Characterizing Cancer Driver Signals. DeepCCDS incorporates a prior knowledge network to characterize cancer driver signals, building upon the self-supervised neural network framework. The signals can reflect key mechanisms influencing cancer cell development and drug response, enhancing the model's predictive performance and interpretability. DeepCCDS has demonstrated superior performance in predicting drug sensitivity compared to previous state-of-the-art approaches across multiple datasets. Benefiting from integrating prior knowledge, DeepCCDS exhibits powerful feature representation capabilities and interpretability. Based on these feature representations, we have identified embedding features that could potentially be used for drug screening in new indications. Further, this work demonstrates the applicability of DeepCCDS on solid tumor samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas. This work believes integrating DeepCCDS into clinical decision-making processes can potentially improve the selection of personalized treatment strategies for cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.