ReviewSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Potential Short- and Long-Term Physiological Effects of Ischemic Preconditioning as an Ergogenic Aid: Revisiting Foundational Mechanisms and Applications.
Review in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ischaemic pre-conditioning improves workload, fatigue and recovery in team sport: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial.Experimental physiology · 2026Trial
- Effects of 8-week ischemic preconditioning on swimming performance and power output in male 100-m freestyle swimmers: a randomized controlled trial.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Trial
- Effects of Acute and Repeated Ischemic Preconditioning on Recovery from Muscle Fatigue after High-Intensity Swim Training in Male Amateur Swimmers.Journal of sports science & medicine · 2025Trial
- High-Intensity Exercise Performance as a Complex Adaptive System: An Integrative Review.Muscles (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Standardizing ischemic preconditioning research in applied exercise physiology.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Review
- Temporal Exercise Conditioning Confers Dual-Phase Cardioprotection Against Isoproterenol-Induced Injury in a Rat Model.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) has emerged as a promising intervention for enhancing health- and exercise-related outcomes. Initially recognized in the 1980s and 1990s for its cardioprotective effects in clinical and animal studies, IPC has since garnered attention for its potential ergogenic benefits. Despite growing interest, the underlying physiological mechanisms remain poorly understood, leading to research exploring cause-effect relationship and evaluating IPC efficacy across diverse exercise models, often yielding mixed results. This Leading Article aims to clarify proposed mechanisms by which IPC may enhance athletic performance and facilitate healing effects. Specifically, this Leading Article discusses both the immediate (short-term) and sustained (long-term) effects of IPC. Short-term effects primarily involve acute improvements in vascular function and exercise capacity, while long-term effects may include cumulative benefits such as enhanced recovery, mitigation of exercise-induced muscle damage and adaptative physiological responses. This article highlights the importance of optimizing experimental protocols by extending the time window between IPC application and testing, to maximize performance outcomes, particularly under conditions associated with muscle damage. Future research should prioritize exploring the long-term effects of IPC on performance and recovery to better understand its potential as a reliable ergogenic aid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.