ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2025
A machine learning model using echocardiographic myocardial strain to detect myocardial ischemia.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep Learning for Cardiac Wall Motion Analysis: A Review of Methods, Challenges, and Clinical Applications.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coronary functional assessment plays a critical role in guiding decisions regarding coronary revascularization. Traditional methods for evaluating functional myocardial ischemia, such as invasive procedures or those involving radiation, have their limitations. Echocardiographic myocardial strain has emerged as a non-invasive and convenient indicator. However, the interpretation of strain values can be subject to inter-operator variability. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning techniques may promise to reduce the variability. By training AI algorithms on a diverse range of echocardiographic data, including strain values, and correlating them with ischemia, it may be possible to develop a robust and automated diagnostic tool. This study aims to provide a non-invasive and effective solution for automated myocardial ischemia detection that can be used in clinical practice. To construct the machine learning model, we used an automatic left ventricular endocardium tracing tool to extract myocardial strain data and integrated it with six clinical features. A coronary angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (caFFR) ≤ 0.80 was defined as the indicator of myocardial ischemia. A total of 636 suspected coronary artery disease subjects were enrolled in this pilot study, where 282 cases (44.3%) had myocardial ischemia. These subjects were randomly divided into training (n = 508) and testing (n = 128) sets at a 4:1. Using ensemble-learning algorithms to train and optimize the model, its diagnostic performance versus caFFR was diagnostic accuracy 85.9%, sensitivity 88.9%, specificity 83.1%, positive predictive value 83.6%, negative predictive value 88.5%. The optimized model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.915 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.862-0.968). Our machine learning prototype model based on echocardiographic myocardial strain shows promising results in detecting myocardial ischemia. Further studies are needed to validate its robustness and generalizability on larger patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40397367What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.