Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40397359›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2025

Occurrence and potential implications of the hook effect in a Borrelia burgdorferi IgG antibody chemiluminescence immunoassay.

Marc Westerholt, Torbjörn Kjerstadius, Lukas Frans Ocias

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. When more is less: follow-up on the hook effect in Borrelia serology.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marc WesterholtDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Karlstad Hospital, Karlstad, Sweden. marwe412@student.liu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0923-9806
Torbjörn KjerstadiusDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Karlstad Hospital, Karlstad, Sweden.
Lukas Frans OciasDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Karlstad Hospital, Karlstad, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLyme borreliosis is diagnosed based on clinical symptoms and serological analysis, with high IgG antibody levels associated with late manifestations. Immunoassays with a broad detection range can exhibit a hook effect, leading to false-low results and potential misdiagnosis. This study aimed to investigate the occurrence of the high-dose hook effect and determine a dilution threshold to detect the hook effect and avoid overdilutions for the Liaison Borrelia IgG immunoassay.

methodsIn a two-year period, 5639 patient samples analysed for Borrelia antibodies were screened at Karlstad Hospital, Sweden. Samples with IgG ≥ 75 AU/mL and < 75 AU/mL with detectable IgM underwent 1:10 dilution, with a further 1:50 dilution for samples with IgG > 240 AU/mL. A Gaussian Mixture Model was used to group samples with and without hook effect.

resultsOf 389 samples eligible for dilution, 262 with IgG < 240 AU/mL were analysed. Of these, 70 (26.7%) showed hook effect, corresponding to 18% of included and 1.2% of all screened samples. Overdilution occurred in 58 (22.1%) diluted samples. Dilution thresholds of 98.7 and 96 AU/mL detected 95% of hook effect and overdilution samples, respectively.

conclusionA substantial number of samples showed hook effect, which could lead to missed late Lyme borreliosis manifestations and inaccurate intrathecal index calculations. A dilution threshold of 98.7 AU/mL in the Liaison Borrelia IgG immunoassay effectively identified 95% of hook effect and avoided more than 95% of overdilutions.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BacterialBorrelia burgdorferiImmunoglobulin GLuminescent MeasurementsLyme DiseaseFemaleHumansImmunoassayImmunoglobulin MMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificitySwedenAntibodies, BacterialImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MBorrelia serologyDiasorinDilution recommendationDilution thresholdIgG antibodiesImmunoassay optimizationLiaison Borrelia IgG immunoassayLyme disease diagnosticsOverdilutionProzone phenomenon

Identifiers

PMID40397359
PMCPMC12321938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.