SynthesisJournal of neuro-oncology2025
Radiosurgery for central nervous system ependymomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEpendymomas, rare malignant central nervous system (CNS) lesions (2-6% of primary CNS tumors), are typically treated with maximal safe resection followed by fractionated radiation therapy. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as an alternative, particularly in recurrent or residual cases. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of SRS for CNS ependymomas, while also identifying key prognostic factors.
methodA systematic search was conducted to identify studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of SRS in WHO Grade 2/3 CNS ependymoma patients. Random-effect meta-analysis was employed.
resultsFourteen studies with 298 patients and 496 lesions were included. Our meta-analysis demonstrated an overall local tumor control (LTC) rate of 72% (95% CI: 65-79%). LTC rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 83% (95% CI: 76-88%), 72% (95% CI: 64-78%), and 69% (95% CI: 61-76%), respectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were estimated at 67% (95% CI: 50-80%), 56% (95% CI: 48-64%), and 51% (95% CI: 39-63%), respectively. Additionally, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 58% (95% CI: 48-67%). The incidence of adverse radiation events (ARE) was 20% (95% CI: 12-31%). Meta-regression showed older age correlated with improved tumor control (P = 0.02) and lower ARE (P = 0.06) and radionecrosis rates (P < 0.01), while larger tumor volumes (P = 0.03) and anaplastic histology (P = 0.01) were associated with poorer PFS.
conclusionsSRS is a reasonably valuable therapeutic option in the multimodal management of WHO Grade 2/3 CNS ependymomas, especially for individuals with inoperable, recurrent, or residual lesions. Key patient and tumor characteristics have been analyzed to determine factors potentially impacting treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40397320What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.