ArticleThe Saudi dental journal2025
Natural nanoparticles versus the gold standard in direct pulp capping: a randomized clinical trial.
Article in The Saudi dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Moringa oleifera leaf extract gel on pulp repair following pulpotomy: an in-vivo study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Radiographic Evaluation of Nano-Propolis, Nano-Curcumin and MTA as Direct Pulp Capping Agents in Young Permanent Teeth.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study compared the efficacy of nanopropolis and nanocurcumin as direct pulp-capping agents to that of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) in recently erupted permanent molars, assessing the clinical and radiographic outcomes over six months. Thirty six permanent molars were randomly allocated to three groups (n = 12 each): MTA (control), nanopropolis and nanocurcumin. The study followed a double-blind design. Clinical and radiological evaluations assessed pain, percussion sensitivity and swelling preoperatively and one week, three months and six months afterwards. At one week, the nanocurcumin group showed significantly higher pain levels than the MTA and nanopropolis groups. The pain scores equalised by three months and remained stable until six months in all groups. Percussion sensitivity and swelling occurred in 8.3% of cases in the MTA group, 25% in the nanopropolis group and 16.7% in the nanocurcumin group. Nanopropolis and nanocurcumin provided clinical and radiographic outcomes comparable to MTA in direct pulp capping of recently erupted permanent molars. While MTA showed slightly superior attributes, the natural nanomaterials present viable alternatives. This study supports the potential use of bioactive nanomaterials derived from natural sources in vital pulp therapy, though longer-term investigations are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.