Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40397221›Full record

ArticleThe Saudi dental journal2025

Natural nanoparticles versus the gold standard in direct pulp capping: a randomized clinical trial.

Dalia M Elasser, Sabah M Sobhy, Rania Rashad Omar Taha, Nevin A Gad, Dina M Abdel-Ghany

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Saudi dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dalia M ElasserOperative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8889-2001
Sabah M SobhyEndodontics Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-2487-8831
Rania Rashad Omar TahaOperative Dentistry Department, Ibn Sina National College, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. raniamaster@ibnsina.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-8633-6726
Nevin A GadOperative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7499-7873
Dina M Abdel-GhanyDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, 6 October University, Giza, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2828-0011

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compared the efficacy of nanopropolis and nanocurcumin as direct pulp-capping agents to that of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) in recently erupted permanent molars, assessing the clinical and radiographic outcomes over six months. Thirty six permanent molars were randomly allocated to three groups (n = 12 each): MTA (control), nanopropolis and nanocurcumin. The study followed a double-blind design. Clinical and radiological evaluations assessed pain, percussion sensitivity and swelling preoperatively and one week, three months and six months afterwards. At one week, the nanocurcumin group showed significantly higher pain levels than the MTA and nanopropolis groups. The pain scores equalised by three months and remained stable until six months in all groups. Percussion sensitivity and swelling occurred in 8.3% of cases in the MTA group, 25% in the nanopropolis group and 16.7% in the nanocurcumin group. Nanopropolis and nanocurcumin provided clinical and radiographic outcomes comparable to MTA in direct pulp capping of recently erupted permanent molars. While MTA showed slightly superior attributes, the natural nanomaterials present viable alternatives. This study supports the potential use of bioactive nanomaterials derived from natural sources in vital pulp therapy, though longer-term investigations are warranted.

Indexed as

MTANano-curcuminNano-propolisYoung permanent teeth

Identifiers

PMID40397221
PMCPMC12397491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.