ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2025
Unraveling the influence mechanisms of different substituents on the chemical activity of N-heterocyclic phosphines via theoretical calculations.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design, Synthesis, and Dft Analysis of Benzaldehyde-Based Ethynyl-Functionalized Donor-Acceptor Dicyanomethyl Derivatives.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Quantum and thermodynamic evaluation of CScientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
contextN-Heterocyclic phosphines (NHP-H) represent a distinctive class of phosphorus-containing heterocycles characterized by "polarity-inverted" P-H bonds. These unique bonds facilitate a wide array of P-H reactions, rendering NHP-H compounds promising candidates for applications in organocatalysis. Although significant advancements have been made in NHP-H research, the experimental quantification of their reactivity parameters poses considerable challenges due to their high reactivity. Furthermore, the influence of various substituents on the chemical activity of NHP-H compounds remains insufficiently understood. This study examines eight NHP-H compounds with varying substituents. The findings indicate that electron-donating substituents decrease the P-H bond order, increase the negative charge on the phosphorus atom, and enhance nucleophilicity. Conversely, electron-withdrawing substituents exhibit opposite effects. Furthermore, substituents influence the local electron attachment energy of the phosphorus atom, thereby affecting reactivity in proton-transfer reactions. According to conceptual density functional theory, electron-donating substituents are associated with lower electrophilicity and higher nucleophilicity indices, whereas electron-withdrawing substituents demonstrate the opposite trend. Charge-transfer spectra suggest that electron-donating substituents reduce the excitation energy of NHP-H, thereby increasing its reactivity. Additionally, IRI analysis indicates that electron-donating substituents weaken the P-H bond, while electron-withdrawing substituents strengthen it, along with alterations in other intramolecular interactions.
methodsThe study utilized the M06-2X functional in conjunction with the def2-TZVP basis set within the SMD model, employing acetonitrile as the solvent, to perform structural optimization and frequency analysis of NHP-H compounds. Computational analyses were conducted using Gaussian 09 software, with 30 excited states calculated for each compound. Multiwfn software facilitated the determination of atomic dipole moment-corrected Hirshfeld population, local electron attachment energy, the Interaction Region Indicator, and charge-transfer spectrum, which were subsequently visualized using VMD 1.9.3. Additionally, GaussView 6.0.16 software was employed to generate three-dimensional molecular configurations and prepare input files.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.