ArticleJournal of medical systems2025
Forecasting Surgical Bed Utilization: Architectural Design of a Machine Learning Pipeline Incorporating Predicted Length of Stay and Surgical Volume.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex of surgeons and team composition and patients' length of stay after surgery: evidence from inpatient claims data in China.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Beyond Root Mean Squared Error: Expanding Operational Validation for Surgical Bed Forecasting Models.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Driven Prediction of Intensive Care Units Mortality and Length of Stay: A 11-Year Retrospective Study in Hong Kong Public Hospitals.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Adult Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery: Real-World Deployments and Outcomes.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Domain-Aware Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Postoperative Hospital Length of Stay from Perioperative Data: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A sequential machine learning framework for ICU and hospital length of stay prediction from admission-time data.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of this study was to develop a machine learning model utilizing data from the electronic health record (EHR) to model length of stay and daily surgical volume, in order to subsequently predict daily surgical inpatient bed utilization. Machine learning is increasingly used to aid healthcare decision-making and resource allocation. Surgical inpatient bed utilization is a key metric of hospital efficiency and an ideal target for optimization. EHR data from all surgical cases over one year at a single institution was obtained. Data from the first 32 weeks of the year were used to train the model with the remaining data used to validate and test the models. Various machine learning approaches were explored to predict hospital length of stay and surgical volume. Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (SARIMA) was used to forecast daily surgical bed requirements. The root mean squared error (RMSE) was reported. For predicting bed utilization > 2 weeks in the future, our optimized models improved prediction from an RMSE of 43.1 to 24.4 beds. For predicting bed utilization in 2 weeks, our optimized models improved prediction from an RMSE of 42.6 to 24.8 beds. Finally, predicting bed utilization same day demonstrated an RMSE of 22.7 beds. We described the architecture of a machine learning approach to forecast surgical bed utilization. Forecasting use of surgical resources may decrease stress on a hospital system through more accurate predicting of the ebbs and flows of hospital needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.