ArticleAnnals of hematology2025
Impact of graft-versus-host disease on outcomes of cord blood transplantation according to HLA disparity and its prophylaxis type.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the impact of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) on cord blood transplantation (CBT) outcomes based on human leukocyte antigen (HLA) disparity and GVHD prophylaxis type. Data from 4,196 adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, or myelodysplastic syndrome were analyzed. Patients were classified by HLA mismatch (8/8-6/8, 5/8, and 4/8-2/8) and further by GVHD prophylaxis type (methotrexate [MTX] or mycophenolate mofetil [MMF]). The impact of aGVHD was assessed using a time-dependent Cox model. Grade I-II aGVHD improved overall survival (OS) in all groups, regardless of HLA mismatches or prophylaxis type. However, grade III-IV aGVHD worsened OS across MMF groups, while in MTX groups, it was unfavorable only in the HLA 8/8-6/8-matched group (HR 1.6, P = 0.01). Grade III-IV aGVHD increased non-relapse mortality (NRM) across all groups but was more pronounced in HLA 4/8-2/8-matched patients receiving MMF. Notably, relapse risk decreased in HLA 4/8-2/8-matched patients with MTX prophylaxis, partially offsetting the negative impact of grade III-IV aGVHD on NRM. These findings suggest that the impact of aGVHD varies with HLA mismatches and prophylaxis type. MTX prophylaxis may mitigate the adverse effects of severe aGVHD in highly mismatched cases, unlike MMF prophylaxis. Careful donor selection considering HLA mismatches is essential when using MMF prophylaxis to manage severe aGVHD and reduce NRM risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.