ReviewArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2025
The myth of 2.5 cm symphyseal diastasis.
Review in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safe definitive surgery in unstable pelvic ring injuries - a retrospective cohort study.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Article
- A novel internal fixation system for sacral fractures: a finite element biomechanical study.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Detection of disruption of the pubic symphysis and resulting anterior pelvic ring instability primarily depends on the symphyseal widening on standard anterior-posterior X-rays. Based on biomechanical and clinical analyses from the 80 to 90's, a cut-off value of 2.5 cm widening distinguished between stable and unstable lesions. A relevant debate developed concerning minor (< 2.5 cm displacement), moderate (> 2.5 cm displacement) and severe disruptions (> 2.5 cm displacement + posterior complete pelvic ring instability) of the pubic symphysis. Analysis of anatomic, biomechanical, physiological and clinical literature showed, that an exact value does not allow this differentiation. Thus, symphyseal posttraumatic disruptions with displacements > 10 mm should be treated surgically, while in minor displacements (5-10 mm) stress examination can guide adequate treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.