ArticleEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery2025
Distal anastomotic new entry tears predict long-term outcomes after hemi-arch repair for DeBakey I aortic dissection†.
Article in European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesAortic arch tears, including distal anastomosis new entry tears and residual arch tears, have been associated with adverse outcomes (false lumen growth, distal reoperation) after hemi-arch repair for DeBakey Type I aortic dissection. However, no study has compared distal anastomosis new entry tears and RATs as independent entities despite their distinct aetiologies and preventative strategies which may inform surgical management.
methodsRetrospective cohort study of adult patients with hemi-arch repair for DeBakey Type I aortic dissection at a tertiary referral centre (1996-2021). We included patients who survived beyond their initial hospitalization with good-quality post-operative CT angiograms. Distal anastomosis new entry tears and residual arch tears metrics were collected from the first good-quality post-operative CT. Maximal aortic diameters (distal to graft) were collected from pre- and post-hemi-arch repair CT angiograms. Presence and imaging characteristics of distal anastomosis new entry tears and RATs were examined for prediction of false lumen growth and distal aortic intervention.
resultsWe included 272 patients, and 24.5% (69) had distal anastomosis new entry tears, which on multivariable analysis was associated with a post-operative descending diameter change of +6.2 mm (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.5, 7.9) and greater risk of distal intervention, hazard ratio 3.24 (95% CI: 1.57, 6.68); residual arch tears were not significantly associated, hazard ratio 0.72 (95% CI: 0.28, 1.83). Distal anastomosis new entry tears located on the greater curvature versus lesser curvature (58% vs 42%, P = 0.044) were more likely to lead to reoperation (45% vs 17%, P = 0.033).
conclusionsDistal anastomosis new entry tears, not residual arch tears, correlate strongly with negative descending aorta remodelling and distal intervention after hemi-arch repair for DeBakey I aortic dissection. Therefore, additional strategies are warranted to prevent distal anastomosis new entry tears, a result of anastomotic technical challenge, during operative repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.