ReviewNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2025
Exploring the antitumor potential of cucurbitacin B in hepatocellular carcinoma through network pharmacology, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulations.
Review in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Processing enhances the anti-hepatocellular carcinoma effect of Momordicae Semen via remodeling chemical composition and regulating the Akt/mTOR/STAT3 pathway.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Article
- Anticancer Effects of Cucurbitacin B and Meleagrin Associated with TYRO3 Downregulation in Colorectal Cancer Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Ultrasound-Optimized Extraction and Multi-Target Mechanistic Analysis of Antioxidant and Hypoglycemic Effects ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cucurbitacin B exhibits promising anticancer activity across various cancers; however, its precise mechanism remains unclear. This study integrates network pharmacology, molecular docking, and dynamics simulations to elucidate CuB's multitarget therapeutic mechanisms against HCC. Potential CuB targets were retrieved from CTD, HERB, SwissTargetPrediction, ETCM, and PharmMapper databases. HCC-related genes were sourced from GEO datasets (GSE216613, GSE101685, GSE62232, GSE46408), GeneCard, DisGeNET, OMIM, and TTD. Intersecting targets were analyzed via PPI networks (STRING/Cytoscape), followed by GO/KEGG enrichment (DAVID). Molecular docking (Autodock Vina), ADMET evaluation (ADMETlab 2.0), and molecular dynamics simulations (Amber20) validated interactions. Core targets were further verified using GEPIA, HPA, cBioPortal, and TIMER databases. A total of 139 shared targets were identified between CuB and HCC. Key targets included EGFR, MTOR, MMP9, HSP90AB1, STAT3, and TNF. KEGG pathway analysis revealed significant enrichment in the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K-Akt) signaling pathway, alongside cancer-related pathways (e.g., lipid metabolism, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance). Molecular docking confirmed strong binding (energy < - 5.0 kcal/mol) between CuB and core targets (e.g., MTOR: - 8.2 kcal/mol; HSP90AB1: - 7.9 kcal/mol). ADMET profiling indicated favorable pharmacokinetic properties, and molecular dynamics simulations demonstrated stable ligand-receptor complexes (RMSD < 2.5 Å). External validation highlighted differential expression (HSP90AB1, TNF) and clinical correlations (CCND1, EGFR) in HCC. CuB exerts antitumor effects in HCC through multitarget modulation, primarily via PI3K-Akt signaling and interactions with EGFR, MTOR, and HSP90AB1. This study provides a mechanistic foundation for CuB's therapeutic potential in HCC, guiding future experimental and clinical investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40397117What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.