ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2025
Assessing Autism Co-Occurrence in Fragile X Syndrome: Proposing a Preliminary CARS-2 Cut-Off Score.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond Surface Performance: Analyzing Grammatical Production and Judgment Abilities in Boys With Fragile X Syndrome.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the agreement between autism classification from the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS-2; as reported by Lord (Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition, Western Psychological Services, 2012)) and the Childhood Autism Rating Scale, 2nd edition (CARS-2; as reported by Schopler (The childhood autism rating scale, second edition (CARS-2), Western Psychological Services, 2010) in individuals with fragile X syndrome (FXS) and to propose a preliminary optimal CARS-2 cut-off score for identifying co-occurring autism in FXS when using the ADOS-2 as gold-standard measure. Forty-three school-aged and adolescent individuals completed the ADOS-2, CARS-2, and cognitive assessments. We found a strong to very strong positive association between the CARS-2 total scores and ADOS-2 total scores for individuals with FXS, and fair agreement between the ADOS-2 and CARS-2 autism classification ratings. Using a receiver-operator characteristic curve, an optimal CARS-2 cut-off score of 24.25 was found for identifying autism in individuals with FXS. Our findings should be considered preliminary, as they represent an examination of measurement agreement rather than validation against comprehensive DSM-5 clinical diagnoses. Studies using CARS-2 in FXS should carefully evaluate the scores or consider using the CARS-2 as a continuous measure of autism traits until the results of this paper are replicated in a larger and more diverse sample.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.