ArticleBotanical studies2025
Comparative metabolomics of acetylcholinesterase and α-glucosidase inhibitors in pericarp of Garcinia mangostana L.
Article in Botanical studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Vincoside Lactam from EdibleFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMangosteen (Garcinia mangostana L.) pericarp extract has demonstrated potential against Alzheimer's disease (AD) and diabetes mellitus (DM). This study introduces a rapid dereplication and comparative approach to identify and characterize acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and α-glucosidase inhibitors in mangosteen pericarp. Using protein-subtraction, MS profiling, and computational modeling is effective for screening, identifying, and analyzing enzyme-inhibiting compounds from plant sources, and quantitative analysis of the main components has been performed.
resultsThe Mangosteen pericarp extract observed significant inhibitory activity against α-glucosidase and AChE, with IC50 values of 31.02 and 70.56 µg/mL, respectively. By comparing profiles of protein-subtracted extracts with non-treated extracts, eight potential inhibitors for each enzyme were identified: 8-desoxygartanin, gartanin, 3-isomangostin, β-mangostin, 9-hydroxycalabaxanthone, γ-mangostin, α-mangostin, and garcinone E. The α-mangostin was the most abundant, comprising 39.589% of the extract. Molecular docking revealed these inhibitors target the peripheral anionic site of AChE and the active site of α-glucosidase, forming key hydrogen bonds and pi-pi stacking interactions.
conclusionThis study emphasizes mangosteen pericarp as a promising natural source of these inhibitors, with potential for use in developing nutraceuticals and pharmaceuticals. The study validated a systems biology approach by applying dereplication and comparative UPLC-ESI-MS/MS metabolomics profiling to identify target-binding molecules in both protein-treated and untreated plant extracts. Further confirmation was obtained through molecular docking predictions, mechanism analysis, and compound quantification assays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.