Trial reportJournal of neuromuscular diseases2025
Defining clinically meaningful thresholds for forced vital capacity in patients with neuromuscular disorders: Lessons learned from the COMET study in Pompe disease.
Trial report in Journal of neuromuscular diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02782741 (A Phase 3 Randomized, Multicenter, Multinational, Double-blinded Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Repeated Biweekly Infusions of Avalglucosidase Alfa), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3 Randomized, Multicenter, Multinational, Double-blinded Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Repeated Biweekly Infusions of Avalglucosidase Alfa (neoGAA, GZ402666) and Alglucosidase Alfa in Treatment naïve Patients With Late-onset Pompe Disease
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-Life Effectiveness After Switching to Avalglucosidase Alfa in Late-Onset Pompe Disease Patients Worsening on Alglucosidase Alfa Therapy: A French Cohort Study.European journal of neurology · 2026Article
- An Indirect Treatment Comparison of Avalglucosidase Alfa versus Cipaglucosidase Alfa Plus Miglustat in Patients with Late-Onset Pompe Disease.Advances in therapy · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundRespiratory impairment in neuromuscular disorders (NMDs) is generally assessed using forced vital capacity (FVC). Any improvement in FVC trajectory will delay ventilatory support; however, the change required for patients to perceive a noticeable clinical benefit, the clinically meaningful threshold (CMT), has not been defined in NMDs.ObjectiveTo derive the within-person and between-group CMTs for FVC (% predicted) in patients with late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD).MethodsThis analysis leverages data from the Phase 3 COMET trial (NCT02782741, registered 25 May 2016), which assessed the efficacy of avalglucosidase alfa (AVA) versus alglucosidase alfa (ALG) on upright FVC (% predicted) in LOPD. Anchor- and distribution-based methods were used to estimate the within-person and between-group CMTs for FVC at Weeks 49 and 97.ResultsCOMET enrolled 99 participants aged ≥18 years (52% male; mean age 48.0 years). The within-person CMT for absolute change in FVC expressed as % predicted was estimated as 3.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.3, 3.8]. The proportion of patients with a meaningful increase in FVC was higher in the AVA versus ALG group across the CI of the estimated CMT (odds ratios: 2.3-2.6; nominal p-values: 0.026-0.058). The between-group CMT, needed to evaluate differences between treatment groups, was estimated as 2.1% predicted [95% CI 1.1, 3.1].ConclusionsWe identified a narrow range of within-person and between-group CMTs for upright FVC (% predicted) in LOPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.