Observational studyArquivos brasileiros de cardiologia2025
Analysis of Ventricular Repolarization in Hypertensive Patients: Influence of Nocturnal Blood Pressure Dipping.
Observational study in Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07200856 (Impact of Nocturnal Blood Pressure Dipping on Ventricular Repolarization in Hypertensive Patients), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact of Nocturnal Blood Pressure Dipping on Ventricular Repolarization in Hypertensive Patients
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Changes in ventricular repolarization are associated with ventricular arrhythmias and higher mortality. The association between a non-dipper blood pressure pattern and changes in ventricular repolarization remains controversial. This study sought to compare ventricular repolarization measurements (QT interval, QTc, Tp-Te, Tp-Te/QT, and QTd) in hypertensive dippers and non-dippers. Secondary objectives are to compare measurements between controlled and uncontrolled hypertensive patients, as well as resistant and non-resistant hypertensive patients. This observational, cross-sectional study involved patients monitored in a Hypertension Service. The level of significance adopted in the statistical analysis was 5%. A total of 130 participants were admitted. The mean age was 67.4 years, with 72% presenting some form of target organ damage. Repolarization measurements did not differ between dippers and non-dippers. However, within the resistant hypertension group, when compared to the non-resistant, differences were observed in the QT interval in V5 (433.3 ms vs. 420.9 ms, p = 0.046), Tp-Te in both V2 (85.4 ms vs. 78.7 ms, p = 0.049) and V5 (84.6 ms vs. 74.6 ms, p = 0.006), Tp-Te/QT in V5 (0.19 vs. 0.18, p = 0.019), Sokolow-Lyon index (18.8 mm vs. 15.7 mm, p = 0.011), and Cornell index (14.2 mm vs. 11.2 mm, p = 0.002), aged-adjusted values. In this high cardiovascular risk hypertensive population, no difference in repolarization measures was found between dippers and non-dippers. However, this is the first study to demonstrate increased ventricular repolarization measures in patients with resistant hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.