Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40396865›Full record

Observational studyArquivos brasileiros de cardiologia2025

Analysis of Ventricular Repolarization in Hypertensive Patients: Influence of Nocturnal Blood Pressure Dipping.

Marco Aurélio Goulart, Dalmo Antonio Ribeiro Moreira, Fernando Yue Cesena, Jonathan Batista Souza, Antonio Gabriele Laurinavicius, Fernanda Marciano Consolim-Colombo, Márcio Gonçalves de Sousa

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07200856 (Impact of Nocturnal Blood Pressure Dipping on Ventricular Repolarization in Hypertensive Patients), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07200856 not yet recruitingnot on this map

Impact of Nocturnal Blood Pressure Dipping on Ventricular Repolarization in Hypertensive Patients

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAssiut UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled140ConditionsHypertension, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory, Circadian Rhythm, ElectrocardiographyArmsNocturnal Blood Pressure Dipping
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marco Aurélio GoulartInstituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, São Paulo, SP - Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-9947-6946
Dalmo Antonio Ribeiro MoreiraInstituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, São Paulo, SP - Brasil.
Fernando Yue CesenaInstituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, São Paulo, SP - Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-1051-9434
Jonathan Batista SouzaInstituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, São Paulo, SP - Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-5193-1441
Antonio Gabriele LaurinaviciusInstituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, São Paulo, SP - Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-6634-4138
Fernanda Marciano Consolim-ColomboInstituto do Coração do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP - Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-3220-019X
Márcio Gonçalves de SousaInstituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, São Paulo, SP - Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-5460-5476

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Changes in ventricular repolarization are associated with ventricular arrhythmias and higher mortality. The association between a non-dipper blood pressure pattern and changes in ventricular repolarization remains controversial. This study sought to compare ventricular repolarization measurements (QT interval, QTc, Tp-Te, Tp-Te/QT, and QTd) in hypertensive dippers and non-dippers. Secondary objectives are to compare measurements between controlled and uncontrolled hypertensive patients, as well as resistant and non-resistant hypertensive patients. This observational, cross-sectional study involved patients monitored in a Hypertension Service. The level of significance adopted in the statistical analysis was 5%. A total of 130 participants were admitted. The mean age was 67.4 years, with 72% presenting some form of target organ damage. Repolarization measurements did not differ between dippers and non-dippers. However, within the resistant hypertension group, when compared to the non-resistant, differences were observed in the QT interval in V5 (433.3 ms vs. 420.9 ms, p = 0.046), Tp-Te in both V2 (85.4 ms vs. 78.7 ms, p = 0.049) and V5 (84.6 ms vs. 74.6 ms, p = 0.006), Tp-Te/QT in V5 (0.19 vs. 0.18, p = 0.019), Sokolow-Lyon index (18.8 mm vs. 15.7 mm, p = 0.011), and Cornell index (14.2 mm vs. 11.2 mm, p = 0.002), aged-adjusted values. In this high cardiovascular risk hypertensive population, no difference in repolarization measures was found between dippers and non-dippers. However, this is the first study to demonstrate increased ventricular repolarization measures in patients with resistant hypertension.

Indexed as

Blood PressureCircadian RhythmHeart VentriclesHypertensionAgedArrhythmias, CardiacCross-Sectional StudiesElectrocardiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID40396865
PMCPMC12108120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.