Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40396849›Full record

ArticleBrazilian oral research2025

Calibration of SB Brasil 2023 examiners: use of technologies associated with the In-Lux method.

Raquel Conceição Ferreira, Rafaela da Silveira Pinto, Claudiojanes Dos Reis, Rosa Núbia Vieira de Moura, Sara Oliveira Aguiar, Andreia Maria Araújo Drummond, Viviane Elisângela Gomes, Andrea Maria Eleutério de Barros Lima Martins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian oral research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. SB Brasil Project: brief history and perspectives for the 2030 edition.Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Tooth loss in Brazilian adolescents: a multilevel cross-sectional study.Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Raquel Conceição FerreiraUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, School of Dentistry, Department of Social and Preventive Dentistry, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8897-9345
Rafaela da Silveira PintoUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, School of Dentistry, Department of Social and Preventive Dentistry, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6169-7708
Claudiojanes Dos ReisFaculdades Unidas do Norte de Minas - Funorte, Faculty of Health Sciences, Montes Claros, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6337-637X
Rosa Núbia Vieira de MouraUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, School of Dentistry, Department of Social and Preventive Dentistry, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8947-2797
Sara Oliveira AguiarUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, School of Dentistry, Departament of Dentistry, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5501-9890
Andreia Maria Araújo DrummondUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, School of Dentistry, Department of Social and Preventive Dentistry, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4161-5602
Viviane Elisângela GomesUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, School of Dentistry, Department of Social and Preventive Dentistry, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5160-5673
Andrea Maria Eleutério de Barros Lima MartinsUniversidade Estadual de Montes Claros - Unimontes, School of Dentistry, Montes Claros, MG, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7865-1733

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This methodological study presents the development and implementation of technological tools for the online training and calibration of dentists participating in the SB Brasil 2023 survey, using the Moodle® platform. The training and in-lux calibration process employed 10 and 25 sets of photographs, respectively. Conditions including dental crown status (dmft and DMFT indexes), caries consequences (pufa/PUFA index), malocclusion (canine relation, overjet, overbite, posterior crossbite, and Dental Aesthetic Index), and dental trauma were evaluated, based on WHO or SB Brasil 2010 criteria. Software was developed to record codes, automated calculations of agreement coefficients (overall percentage, score-specific, and simple and weighted kappa), and generate reports. Examiners were allowed to repeat calibration attempts until they achieved a minimum agreement (Kappa ≥ 0.61). In total, 1,513 examiners used the software, and 728 successfully completed the calibration with substantial or higher agreement across all conditions/indexes. Individual reports described discrepancies and monitored attempts. Occlusal conditions had the lowest percentages of almost perfect agreement and required more attempts to achieve calibration. The technological tools implemented in SB Brasil 2023 enabled online training and calibration, promoting consistency among examiners for fieldwork. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of remote strategies for calibration in epidemiological surveys, particularly in scenarios involving multiple geographically distributed examiners, with potential applications in other contexts and health areas.

Indexed as

DentistsPhotography, DentalBrazilCalibrationDental CariesHumansMalocclusionObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsSoftware

Identifiers

PMID40396849
PMCPMC12096852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.