Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40396780›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025

Fighting isn't sexy in lekking greater sage-grouse: a relational event model approach for mating interactions.

Samuel S Snow, Gail L Patricelli, Carter T Butts, Alan H Krakauer, Anna C Perry, Ryane Logsdon, Richard O Prum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samuel S SnowInstitute for Advanced Study in Toulouse, University of Toulouse 1 Capitole, Toulouse, Occitanie, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2890-4717
Gail L PatricelliDepartment of Evolution and Ecology and Animal Behavior Graduate Group, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3397-8390
Carter T ButtsSchool of Social Sciences, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Alan H KrakauerDepartment of Evolution and Ecology and Animal Behavior Graduate Group, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9177-7963
Anna C PerryDepartment of Evolution and Ecology and Animal Behavior Graduate Group, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8154-295X
Ryane LogsdonDepartment of Evolution and Ecology and Animal Behavior Graduate Group, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2850-2312
Richard O PrumEcology & Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4741-7132

Funding

French National Research Agency (ANR)National Institute of Food and AgricultureNational Science Foundation DGE-1122492NIH HHS DGE-1148897Yale Institute for Biospheric Studies Doctoral Pilot GrantYale University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between aggression and mate choice in mating systems is critical for understanding the evolution and diversification of sexual organisms and yet remains the subject of vigorous debate. A key challenge is that traditional correlational approaches cannot distinguish underlying mechanisms of social interaction and can indicate misleading positive associations between aggression and mating events. We implement a novel relational event model (REM) incorporating temporal dependencies of events in a social network to study natural reproductive behaviour in a lek-breeding system where males gather to display and females visit to evaluate mates, often observing both male courtship displays and fights. We find that fighting is not attractive to females. Indeed, males are less likely to start and more likely to leave fights with females present, plausibly to avoid entanglement in protracted combat cycles arising from emergent social processes that reduce availability to mate. However, fighting serves other roles, e.g. to deter copulation interruptions and rebuff competitors. Our findings support the hypothesis that social systems regulating conflict and promoting females' choice based on display are fundamental to stable lek evolution. Moreover, our analysis highlights the utility of the REM framework in testing mechanistic hypotheses in behavioural ecology and evolution.

Indexed as

AggressionGalliformesMating Preference, AnimalSexual Behavior, AnimalAnimalsFemaleMaleModels, Biologicallekmale aggressionmate choicerelational event modelsocial network

Identifiers

PMID40396780
PMCPMC12094110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.