ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2025
Laboratory validation of targeted next-generation sequencing assay for pathogen detection in lower respiratory infection.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Initial Analytical Evaluation of a Multiplex PCR-Based Targeted NGS Assay for Expanded Viral Detection in Clinical Respiratory Specimens.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Clinical diagnostic value of targeted next generation sequencing for lower respiratory tract infection: a retrospective study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Targeted next-generation sequencing-based pathogens detection in children with severe pneumonia in the pediatric intensive care unit.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Decoding pulmonary infections through targeted next-generation sequencing: comprehensive pathogen profiling in 999 clinical cases.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) is a serious global public health issue and poses significant challenges for detection and diagnosis. We validated the detection performance of targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) based on multiplex PCR using simulated microbial sample panels and clinical samples, providing a theoretical basis for promoting and applying tNGS in clinical diagnosis. We used a series of simulated microbial sample panels to validate the analytical validity of tNGS comprehensively. We also use tNGS to test respiratory specimens from 108 diagnosed or suspected LRTI patients to validate its clinical validity in diagnosing LRTI. Finally, we summarize the drug-resistance genes obtained from tNGS, the detection cost, and the turnaround time. tNGS has good analytical specificity, sensitivity, and precision. It has good stability when stored under low-temperature conditions. Using the composite diagnostic criteria as the gold standard, our internal tNGS platform has a sensitivity of 84.38%, specificity of 91.67%, positive predictive value of 98.78%, and negative predictive value of 42.31%. In terms of turnaround time, tNGS (about 16 h) and metagenomic next-generation sequencing (about 24 h) are similar, both significantly superior to traditional microbial detection methods (3-5 days). The cost of tNGS is approximately one-fourth of metagenomic next-generation sequencing. As a novel method with acceptable performance and cost, tNGS can compensate for the shortcomings of commonly used pathogen detection schemes in clinical practice, and its application prospects are worth looking forward to. IMPORTANCE: Lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) is a serious global public health problem, and detecting its pathogenic microorganisms is difficult. Targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) is a rising star in microbial detection, with enormous potential. To understand the detection performance of tNGS and provide a theoretical basis for promoting its application in clinical diagnosis, this study prepared simulated microbial sample panels using reference materials to evaluate the analytical and clinical validity of tNGS. Our research suggests that tNGS has good analytical specificity and sensitivity, precision, and stability. Additionally, it can reliably detect common LRTI pathogens. It has advantages in identifying co-infections and atypical pathogens. Moreover, tNGS significantly reduces turnaround time, allowing faster treatment. In summary, tNGS is expected to be used in clinical practice to diagnose and manage LRTI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.