Trial reportJournal of viral hepatitis2025
Universal HCV Screening in Hospitalised Patients in France: It Could Be a Good Option! The DEVICHO Study.
Trial report in Journal of viral hepatitis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficiency of decentralized screening for hepatitis C in different healthcare settings: retrospective study over 6 years in southeastern Spain.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In France, chronic hepatitis C whatever fibrosis stage or comorbidities can be freely treated by any physician. However, screening is still currently based on risk factors, and universal screening remains controversial. The aims of this prospective DEVICHO study were to assess the value of universal screening in hospitalised patients, to evaluate the prevalence of HCV infection and to compare the short-term cost and benefit of this strategy with routine screening. From November 2019 to November 2021, all hospitalised patients from 22 departments were asked by their physicians to be tested for HCV. 4986/25,663 (19.4%) in the DEVICHO study (Group 1) and 1803 patients (7%) outside the study (Group 2) were screened. HCV screening rate varied widely (0%-75.1%) between departments. One hundred and ninety-nine patients (2.9%) were HCV-Ab positive. 29/199 HCV-Ab positive patients (14.6%) or 29/6789 patients tested (0.4%) were HCV-RNA positive. Among the 29 viremic patients, 9 (31%) were treated, all achieving sustained virological response, but two patients died rapidly after treatment. Seventeen patients died untreated within a year of diagnosis, and three patients were not treated. Universal screening compared to routine practice would be more expensive and more effective, resulting in an additional cost of €11,060 per HCV RNA infection identified and €36,600 per HCV cure, both below the GDP per capita of France (€38,000, Eurostat 2023). Even if the population screened is older, often with significant comorbidities, hospital-based HCV screening is efficient because its prevalence is higher in hospitalised patients than in the general population. Additionally, this screening strategy appears to be cost effective. However, healthcare professionals and insufficient linkage to care are the main barriers to screening. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NTC 04437277.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.