ArticlePersonality & social psychology bulletin2026
Machine Learning Culture: Cultural Membership Classification as an Exploratory Approach to Cross-Cultural Psychology.
Article in Personality & social psychology bulletin, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research in cultural differences generally follow top-down, theoretical approaches. This has overrepresented theories (such as individualism-collectivism) derived mainly from Western-centric observations of cultural phenomenon. We present an alternative, exploratory approach: machine learning for classifying participants' cultural membership on international surveys. Using Wave 6 of the World Values Survey, we show that these models, paired with interpretable machine learning methods (relative variable importance and partial dependence plots), can represent magnitudes of differences between any two countries while simultaneously identifying strongly differing predictors. Analysis 1 constructs indices of cultural distance centered on USA and China, replicating previous research that used alternative methods of distance computations. Analysis 2 zooms in on USA-China, USA-Japan, and Japan-China differences, demonstrating the effectiveness of the method in both uncovering consistently known areas of cultural difference, and identifying novel dimensions for further research. Accordingly, this approach appears to be particularly effective in cultural comparisons that are traditionally overlooked.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.