Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40396644›Full record

ArticlePersonality & social psychology bulletin2026

Machine Learning Culture: Cultural Membership Classification as an Exploratory Approach to Cross-Cultural Psychology.

Kongmeng Liew, Takeshi Hamamura, Yukiko Uchida

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Personality & social psychology bulletin, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kongmeng LiewUniversity of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-0755-7173
Takeshi HamamuraCurtin University, Perth, Australia.
Yukiko UchidaKyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research in cultural differences generally follow top-down, theoretical approaches. This has overrepresented theories (such as individualism-collectivism) derived mainly from Western-centric observations of cultural phenomenon. We present an alternative, exploratory approach: machine learning for classifying participants' cultural membership on international surveys. Using Wave 6 of the World Values Survey, we show that these models, paired with interpretable machine learning methods (relative variable importance and partial dependence plots), can represent magnitudes of differences between any two countries while simultaneously identifying strongly differing predictors. Analysis 1 constructs indices of cultural distance centered on USA and China, replicating previous research that used alternative methods of distance computations. Analysis 2 zooms in on USA-China, USA-Japan, and Japan-China differences, demonstrating the effectiveness of the method in both uncovering consistently known areas of cultural difference, and identifying novel dimensions for further research. Accordingly, this approach appears to be particularly effective in cultural comparisons that are traditionally overlooked.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonMachine LearningChinaClassification AlgorithmsHumansJapanSocial GroupUnited Statescultural differencecultural distanceexploratory approachesmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40396644
PMCPMC13310304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.