Observational studyThoracic cancer2025
Impact of Modifying Lazertinib Doses on Effectiveness and Safety in Patients With EGFR-Positive Advanced Lung Cancer: A Multicenter, Prospective Observational Cohort Study.
Observational study in Thoracic cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe clinical application of lazertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has extended to the treatment of EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, the effects of its dose modification on its efficacy and safety have not yet been adequately established.
methodsThis prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study aims to evaluate the clinical implications of adjusting the lazertinib dose. Patients will be categorized into two groups based on the lazertinib dose administered during the initial 12 weeks of treatment in routine clinical practice: 160 and 240 mg groups. The primary endpoints are progression-free survival in the 160 mg group and identifying risk factors associated with dose modification during the 12-week period. DISCUSSION: The findings from the present study will provide real-world insights into the clinical factors leading to lazertinib dose adjustments and deepen our understanding of the efficacy and safety of lazertinib in patients with NSCLC. Our research will contribute toward optimizing medical strategies for NSCLC treatment and aid clinicians in making accurate clinical decisions regarding dose modifications in routine practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.