ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2025
Habitat dynamics of flagship species for conservation prioritization in southern Europe.
Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Habitat suitability assessment of mouflon applying a comparative approach on expert-based and species distribution models.PloS one · 2026Article
- Habitat dynamics of flagship species for conservation prioritization in southern Europe.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biodiversity loss is accelerating due to human actions, and decision-making for conservation needs to be streamlined. Ex situ biodiversity modeling and monitoring based on satellite time-series data could be an affordable and cost-efficient tool for improving the prioritization of conservation areas. We developed a set of dynamic indicators for conservation prioritization based on a habitat suitability index (HSI) trend analysis of 6 flagship species (two vascular plants, bird, amphibian, reptile, and mammal) over 19 years (2001-2019) in Andalucía (southern Spain). The HSI models were derived from ecological niche models (MaxEnt) and satellite time-series data (MODIS) as predictors. Based on the annual HSI models of all species and using the spatial conservation prioritization tool Marxan, we derived interannual dynamic indicators of habitat quality for conservation prioritization. Overall, models showed a generalized habitat regression. The best predictors of habitat quality were related to vegetation composition and structure (land cover), climate (land surface temperature), and energy balance (evapotranspiration), matching with the ecology of climate (such as Abies pinsapo) or vegetation-dependent (such as Alytes dickhilleni) species. Marxan identified interannual dynamics for the priority areas outside and inside protected areas. Interannual variation in habitat quality led to shifting conservation priorities across Andalucia from 2001 to 2019. Only 10.5% of the region and 20% of protected areas showed high spatial stability. Stable zones appeared both inside and outside protected areas. The south and northeast consistently exhibited high-priority regions. The legacy indicator highlighted areas of historical importance that have since declined in importance. New high-value areas emerged in the south. Static and dynamic approaches to conservation planning differed significantly. Many areas prioritized in 2019 alone ranked lower when long-term trends were considered. Our multiscale method underscores the need to integrate temporal dynamics into effective conservation strategies to achieve long-term conservation objectives in an efficient way.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.