ReviewCephalalgia : an international journal of headache2025
Advancing understanding of migraine pathophysiology and therapy by consideration of patient sex.
Review in Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Changes overtime in primary and secondary empty sella: a comparative real-world study.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026Article
- The association between social factors and migraine or severe headache in men: a secondary analysis of national population-based studies with machine learning models.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
- Substrate-selective COX-2 inhibition by IMMA attenuates posttraumatic headache via endocannabinoid modulation and neuroinflammatory suppression.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent reports support the startling conclusion that peripheral nociceptors, the first link in pain transmission, are sexually dimorphic. The mechanisms promoting pain in men and women are therefore likely to be different, suggesting the need to consider patient sex as a factor in managing pain and painful conditions such as migraine. Many patients do not achieve sufficient benefit from available therapies and migraine therefore remains a major unmet medical need. The concept of sexual dimorphism in pain mechanism reveals previously unrecognized gaps in knowledge of migraine pathophysiology and in treatment outcomes. As migraine is highly female prevalent, our knowledge is based on studies conducted predominately in women. Data from these studies have rarely been analyzed and reported based on sex, limiting our interpretation of the occurrence, timing and severity of disease symptoms as well as possible differences in treatment efficacy in men. Inclusion of a higher proportion of men in both mechanistic investigations and clinical trials is therefore needed. Advancing our knowledge and improving therapeutic outcomes will require both preclinical and clinical investigations that address the contribution of sex in headache pain and other non-painful symptoms of migraine that impact the quality of life for patients. This viewpoint highlights the importance of considering sex as a variable in advancing our understanding of migraine pathophysiology and therapy. Consideration of patient sex could influence current clinical practice and the design of clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.