Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40396451›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2025

Experimental noise and light pollution alter prey detection in a nocturnal bird of prey.

Arianna Passarotto, Chiara Morosinotto, Patrik Karell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Fin Whale (Ecology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Arianna PassarottoEvolutionary Ecology Unit, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6661-8714
Chiara MorosinottoEvolutionary Ecology Unit, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9172-894X
Patrik KarellEvolutionary Ecology Unit, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0297-125X

Funding

Italian Ministry of University and Research, National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP) - Italian Ministery of University and Research CN00000033Research Council of Finland 309992Research Council of Finland 314108Research Council of Finland 335335Svenska Kulturfunden 168034Universidad de Sevilla MSALAS-2022-22312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urban expansion has led to ever increasing noise and light pollution, which impairs the audio-visual perception of wild animals and drives changes in key activities and behaviours. Nocturnal predators may be especially affected in detecting prey, with potentially dramatic consequences for their fitness. However, the combined effects of noise and light pollution on predator performance are still mostly unstudied. We experimentally exposed tawny owls (Strix aluco), nocturnal acoustic raptors, to traffic noise and artificial light. We provided both visual and acoustic prey cues to assess potential non-additive effects among multiple sensory stressors on the ability to detect prey. We found that, in control conditions, owls responded equally to both acoustic and visual prey cues. In contrast, noise and light individually decreased owls' ability to locate acoustic, but not visual, prey cues. When owls were exposed to noise and light combined also visual detection worsened, but not beyond the additive expectation. Conversely, the presence of light seemingly buffered the negative impact of noise on acoustic detection, suggesting an antagonistic interaction. Our findings show that both anthropogenic noise and light affect the hunting behaviour of a nocturnal avian predator, but with a stronger effect on acoustic than visual detection, suggesting that the magnitude of their disruptive impact might depend on the type of prey cue. This implies that sensory pollution might lead to increased reliance on sight-oriented hunting strategies. Importantly, our study shows that the co-occurrence of noise and light can have complex and unexpected impacts on behaviour, underscoring the importance of examining sensory pollution in a multimodal context.

Indexed as

LightLight PollutionNoisePredatory BehaviorStrigiformesAnimalsCuesVisual Perceptionacoustic predatorsartificial light at nightenvironmental changehunting behaviourinteractive effectstraffic noiseurbanisation

Identifiers

PMID40396451
PMCPMC12214444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.