ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2025
Experimental noise and light pollution alter prey detection in a nocturnal bird of prey.
Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fin Whale (Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Experimental Exposure to Noise Affects Hunting Behavior Already From a Young Age in a Nocturnal Acoustic Predator.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Experimental noise and light pollution alter prey detection in a nocturnal bird of prey.The Journal of animal ecology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Urban expansion has led to ever increasing noise and light pollution, which impairs the audio-visual perception of wild animals and drives changes in key activities and behaviours. Nocturnal predators may be especially affected in detecting prey, with potentially dramatic consequences for their fitness. However, the combined effects of noise and light pollution on predator performance are still mostly unstudied. We experimentally exposed tawny owls (Strix aluco), nocturnal acoustic raptors, to traffic noise and artificial light. We provided both visual and acoustic prey cues to assess potential non-additive effects among multiple sensory stressors on the ability to detect prey. We found that, in control conditions, owls responded equally to both acoustic and visual prey cues. In contrast, noise and light individually decreased owls' ability to locate acoustic, but not visual, prey cues. When owls were exposed to noise and light combined also visual detection worsened, but not beyond the additive expectation. Conversely, the presence of light seemingly buffered the negative impact of noise on acoustic detection, suggesting an antagonistic interaction. Our findings show that both anthropogenic noise and light affect the hunting behaviour of a nocturnal avian predator, but with a stronger effect on acoustic than visual detection, suggesting that the magnitude of their disruptive impact might depend on the type of prey cue. This implies that sensory pollution might lead to increased reliance on sight-oriented hunting strategies. Importantly, our study shows that the co-occurrence of noise and light can have complex and unexpected impacts on behaviour, underscoring the importance of examining sensory pollution in a multimodal context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.