ArticleBJPsych open2025
Relationship of a public mental health campaign with health service use and association with symptom management knowledge.
Article in BJPsych open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMental health literacy can potentially be improved through a public mental health campaign. The aim of the campaign Every Mind Matters (EMM) was to support adults to help address common subclinical mental health problems and improve their mental well-being and literacy, by using its National Health Service-endorsed digital resources.
aimsAlthough not an objective of the campaign itself, this study aims to (a) address the relationship of EMM through the use of general practitioners and mental health therapists and (b) explore the association of EMM with symptom management knowledge.
methodHealth Survey for England 2019 data were obtained on campaign awareness, uptake of campaign materials and the use of general practitioners and therapists. Logistic regression models were used to explore the impact of the campaign on whether services were used, and ordered logistic models explored the impact on the number of contacts. Campaign costs were viewed alongside symptom management outcomes.
resultsThe analyses included 2023 individuals. Of those campaign aware, 16% had contact with a general practitioner for mental health reasons compared with 9% of those who were campaign unaware. Those who were campaign aware were also significantly more likely to have seen a mental health therapist. The campaign cost per unit improvement in symptom management knowledge was below £20.
conclusionsContact with general practitioners and therapists was associated with campaign awareness. If even a small proportion of symptom management knowledge improvement is due to the campaign, then it has the potential to be cost-effective. Further work is required to establish this.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.