Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40396325›Full record

ArticleRecent advances in inflammation & allergy drug discovery2026

A Comparative Analysis between Lymphocytic Esophagitis and Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

Mukundkumar V Patel, Maitri M Patel, Dhara K Patel, Dhruvkumar M Patel, Lalitkumar B Patel, Sanjay Rajput

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Recent advances in inflammation & allergy drug discovery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mukundkumar V PatelDepartment of Medicine, Annaya College of Medicine and Research, Kalol, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
Maitri M PatelDepartment of Pediatrics, Smt. NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, India.
Dhara K Patel3rd-year Resident Pathology, GCS Medical College and Research Centre, Ahmedabad, India.
Dhruvkumar M PatelPGY4 Resident, Louisiana State University, Shreveport, LA, USA.
Lalitkumar B PatelDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Narendra Modi Medical College, Ahmedabad, India.
Sanjay RajputDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ansh Clinic, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLymphocytic Esophagitis (LyE) and Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) share many clinical and endoscopic features. However, their treatment outcomes and prognoses differ significantly. LyE, the least recognized form of esophagitis, requires further research. This study compares symptoms, risk factors, and endoscopic findings in LyE and EoE patients.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study reviewed medical records, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) findings, and biopsy data. Patients with gastrointestinal symptoms who underwent EGD-guided segmental esophageal biopsies between March 2018 and January 2024 were included. Demographic data, clinical features, risk factors, and EGD findings were compared between LyE, EoE, non-specific esophagitis (NSE), and normal esophageal histology (NEH) groups. The LyE and EoE groups were compared and statistically analyzed with a third comparison group formed jointly by NSE and NEH subgroups.

resultsThe cohort included 11 LyE cases (1.25%), 79 EoE cases (8.96%), 447 NSE cases (50.68%), and 345 NEH cases (39.11%). LyE patients were older, with a mean age of 54.81 years, and 72.72% of them were female. In contrast, EoE patients were younger, with a mean age of 43.52 years, and had a male predominance. Cases of dysphagia, dyspepsia, and nausea or vomiting occurred in both groups. Food impaction was more frequent in EoE. Smoking, alcohol use, and autoimmune diseases (e.g., hypothyroidism and rheumatoid arthritis) were significant risk factors for LyE. Atopic conditions such as asthma and allergies were linked to EoE. Endoscopic findings often overlapped in LyE and EoE. Esophagitis and strictures were more common in LyE, while rings and furrows were more frequent in EoE. All endoscopic findings, including normal mucosa, were significant in LyE and EoE compared to the comparison group. However, rings, linear furrows, and exudates were not significant when comparing LyE to the comparison group. DISCUSSION: This single-center study, limited by a small sample size and geographic scope, addresses the diagnostic challenges posed by overlapping features of Lymphocytic and Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Despite the lack of standardized definitions and variable diagnostic thresholds in previous literature, our use of uniform histopathological criteria (≥20 lymphocytes or eosinophils per HPF) and a large control group enhances the consistency and reliability of the findings.

conclusionLyE is a rare form of esophagitis with clinical and endoscopic features similar to EoE. Accurate histopathological diagnosis is essential for differentiation. LyE is more common in older females with autoimmune conditions, while EoE affects younger males with atopic conditions.

Indexed as

Eosinophilic EsophagitisEsophagitisEsophagusAdultAgedBiopsyEndoscopy, Digestive SystemFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorsdysphagiaeosinophilic esophagitisesophageal biopsyEsophagogastroduodenoscopyfood impactionlymphocytic esophagitisnon-specific esophagitis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.