Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40396117›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025

Improving pain score and restraint duration during circumcision.

Ramzi A Kilani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ramzi A KilaniDepartment of Pediatrics and Family Practice, University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC), Peoria, Illinois, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends providing adequate analgesia during circumcision. Ring block is the most effective method of analgesia, while topical crème (EMLA: lidocaine and prilocaine topical) alone is ineffective. We conducted a quality improvement (QI) project. The aim was to reduce pain scores and restraint duration during circumcision by 20% from baseline over six months. Methods: We followed the standard QI process using PDSA cycles and standard QI charts. Results: Our preintervention data over six weeks revealed significantly higher pain scores if residents performed the procedure or if EMLA was used compared to nerve block. Our intervention included but was not limited to having a new policy to stop using EMLA and have residents watch a video on ring block before performing the procedure. Data collected over subsequent 3.5 months showed that the mean restraint time was reduced by 29% by attendings and by 15% by residents, the use of EMLA cream was eliminated, mean pain score was reduced by 82% when performed by residents and by 20% by attendings, and pain score above 3 was reduced by 100% by residents and attendings. We conducted a sustainability phase over two months. We demonstrated the sustainability of reduced restraint time among attendings but to a lesser extent among residents and the sustainability of mean pain score among both. Conclusions: We conclude that improving effective analgesia during circumcision can be achieved and sustained using the QI project.

Indexed as

Circumcisionneonatepainrestraintring block

Identifiers

PMID40396117
PMCPMC12088550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.