Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40396084›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025

COVID-19 pandemic versus six "A"s of health care services - accessibility, affordability, availability, appropriateness, adequacy, and adherence.

Kalidas Sandhya, Priyadharsini R Palanisamy, R Sandhya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kalidas SandhyaDepartment of Pharmacology, JIPMER, Karaikal, Pondicherry, India.
Priyadharsini R PalanisamyDepartment of Pharmacology, JIPMER, Karaikal, Pondicherry, India.
R SandhyaDepartment of Pharmacology, JIPMER, Karaikal, Pondicherry, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Rationale: COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a huge setback in health care sector causing morbidity, mortality, lack of manpower, resources, in hospitals. Apart from the direct effects of the disease, the indirect effects include, lockdowns, restriction of movement of people for food, work, medicines, etc. There are certain non-communicable diseases for which lifelong treatment and continuation of care is required and the patients suffering from these diseases were also highly affected during pandemic. The major pillars of health care services are accessibility, affordability, availability appropriateness, adequacy and adherence and it is true that the pandemic had its impact on all these pillars. Methodology: A prospective cross sectional study in which 284 patients with NCD answered a questionaire and the responses were analysed. Results: There was a lack of accessibility (48%), affordability (42%) availability (54%) appropriateness and 71% of population took self-medication during the period. There was discontinuity in 16% of the population and the reasons for discontinuation include depression, lack of motivation, forgetfulness, financial crisis etc. Conclusion: The pandemic exerted a greater influence on saturation of health care services by increasing the mortality, morbidity and as a consequence decreased the health care services to communicable/non-communicable diseases. Our study shows the need and demand for robust health care services during critical times.

Indexed as

AccessibilityadequacyadherenceaffordabilityappropriatenessavailabilityCOVID-19health care

Identifiers

PMID40396084
PMCPMC12088546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.