ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Machine learning-based mathematical equations for dengue positivity detection using elementary laboratory parameters.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tree-Based Machine Learning for Diagnostic Classification of Dengue Fever Using Routine Hematological Parameters: A Secondary Analysis of a Publicly Available Dataset.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Dengue is a common and important arboviral infection transmitted by the domestic Aedes aegypti mosquito. Dengue has managed to create a huge burden on public health globally. Severe dengue may prove to be fatal. Hence, early recognition of severe cases is essential for proper management. However, the traditional methods of dengue diagnosis (ELISA, RT-PCR) recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) are not available in resource-constrained settings. Materials and Methods: As a replacement, two machine learning (ML)-based prediction models, specifically Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN), are utilized to predict dengue infection. These two models serve as a more affordable and simpler alternative to traditional methods because they deal with only five elementary parameters [i.e. Age, Total Leucocyte Count (TLC), Haemoglobin, Platelet Count, and Erythrocyte Sedimentation rate (ESR)]. A comprehensive review of all the input parameters is conducted, and the positivity prediction of dengue infection is correlated with past investigations. These parameters were evaluated in 122 patients who were advised to undergo a dengue test in an NABL-accredited private diagnostic centre in Midnapore, India, from June 2022 to September 2023. Out of total 122 patients, 71 were found to have greater than 9 Panbio units in the NS1 test, and 51 were found to have fewer than 9 Panbio units in the NS1 test. Results: In the present study for dengue positivity detection, the correctness of the predicted classes is determined to be 87.5% and 95.83% for MARS and ANN, respectively. Conclusion: From both ML models, it is observed that Platelet Count is the most relatively important input parameter. In addition, two predictive mathematical equations are presented to detect dengue positivity for each ML model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.