ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Identifying the e-health prevalence and influence pattern: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the feasibility of artificial intelligence models as patient information advisors for human papillomavirus vaccines.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Internet has transformed healthcare by providing unparalleled access to medical information, resources and support. Objective: This study explores the prevalence, reasons why people turn to the Internet for their healthcare information needs, and highlighting potential benefits, limitation of their assessments experiences. Methods: This study was conducted amongst OPD visiting tients through a pre-validated questionnaire. Subjects were divided into 2 groups:patients through a pre-validated questionnaire and subjects were divided into 2 groups, Internet Use Before Doctor's Consultation (IBD) and Internet Use After Doctor's Consultation (IAD). Results: Out of 957 study participants, > 57% agreed to have used internet for health information. More than half of them were young whereas elderly relied solely on doctors. Most common reasons were to know the status of health, management of the disease, or cause of the disease. The e-Health seeking was beneficial for both the groups and improved doctor-patient relationship but more so for IAD group (p<0.0001). Conclusion: This study had tried to address the gap in the literature regarding e-Health prevalence patterns for seeking health information, and also observed that how e-Health seeking affects people's actions, behavior, and feelings. Results can give insight to professionals on this issue and prepare them to collaborate, facilitate, or empower patients to access and manage health information online. Physicians should ensure they provide patients with essential information during consultations, empowering them to effectively evaluate medical information encountered through e-health platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.