Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40396077›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025

Identifying the e-health prevalence and influence pattern: A cross-sectional study.

Gurparvesh Singh Goraya, Bhawna Sahota, Sidakbir Singh Paul, Birinder Singh Paul, Gunchan Paul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gurparvesh Singh GorayaDayanand Medical College and Hospital, Department of Medicine, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Bhawna SahotaDayanand Medical College and Hospital, Department of Medicine, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Sidakbir Singh PaulDayanand Medical College and Hospital, Department of Medicine, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Birinder Singh PaulDayanand Medical College and Hospital, Department of Neurology, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Gunchan PaulDayanand Medical College and Hospital, Department of Critical Care, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Internet has transformed healthcare by providing unparalleled access to medical information, resources and support. Objective: This study explores the prevalence, reasons why people turn to the Internet for their healthcare information needs, and highlighting potential benefits, limitation of their assessments experiences. Methods: This study was conducted amongst OPD visiting tients through a pre-validated questionnaire. Subjects were divided into 2 groups:patients through a pre-validated questionnaire and subjects were divided into 2 groups, Internet Use Before Doctor's Consultation (IBD) and Internet Use After Doctor's Consultation (IAD). Results: Out of 957 study participants, > 57% agreed to have used internet for health information. More than half of them were young whereas elderly relied solely on doctors. Most common reasons were to know the status of health, management of the disease, or cause of the disease. The e-Health seeking was beneficial for both the groups and improved doctor-patient relationship but more so for IAD group (p<0.0001). Conclusion: This study had tried to address the gap in the literature regarding e-Health prevalence patterns for seeking health information, and also observed that how e-Health seeking affects people's actions, behavior, and feelings. Results can give insight to professionals on this issue and prepare them to collaborate, facilitate, or empower patients to access and manage health information online. Physicians should ensure they provide patients with essential information during consultations, empowering them to effectively evaluate medical information encountered through e-health platforms.

Indexed as

Behaviorcommunicationdoctor–patient relationshipe-healthInternet-informed patients

Identifiers

PMID40396077
PMCPMC12088548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.