ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Knowledge, attitude, and practice of artificial intelligence among doctors and medical students in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- AI applied to Saudi Arabia higher education: systematic literature review-SLR with PRISMA and VOSviewer.Frontiers in big data · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Healthcare professionals' perceptions and needs for a Home-based Artificial Intelligence Pain Management System for cancer pain: A qualitative study.International journal of nursing sciences · 2026Article
- Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Related to AI in Learning and Research Among Medical Students in Vietnam: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Healthcare Practice and Research: A Cross-Sectional Study of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices in Balochistan, Pakistan.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitude, and perception of artificial intelligence among medical residents in Oman: readiness for clinical practice.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Exploring Physicians' Willingness to Integrate Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Practice: Ethical and Practical Insights From a Jordanian Cross-Sectional Survey.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Preparing tomorrow's physicians for AI-driven healthcare: insights from a study on medical students', interns', and residents' knowledge, attitudes, and educational needs.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Perception and awareness of healthcare professionals toward the applications of artificial intelligence in Egyptian healthcare settings.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is advancing rapidly across fields, including healthcare, where it is being adopted for diagnostics and patient management. However, research on Saudi Arabian healthcare professionals' understanding and perceptions of AI remains limited. Objectives: This study aims to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) regarding AI among medical students, interns, and residents, identifying educational gaps and perceptions of AI's future in medicine. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, targeting medical students, interns, and residents. An online questionnaire collected demographic information, as well as participants' knowledge and attitudes towards AI, and their experience with its applications in medicine. Responses were analyzed statistically for any associations. Results: Of 374 responses, 98.4% were aware of AI, though only 50.5% could identify AI subtypes, and 48.9% understood its medical applications. Formal AI education was lacking for 59.4%, despite 81.8% recognizing AI's importance in diagnosis. Concerns about AI's impact on jobs were noted by 77.8%. While 62.6% had used AI in practice, 66.6% found it beneficial. Conclusion: High awareness of AI contrasts with gaps in specific knowledge and formal training. Positive attitudes are tempered by job security concerns. Findings suggest the need for a structured AI curriculum in medical education to improve comprehension and application in healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.