Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40396057›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025

Comparative study of intraocular pressure variation among healthy and diabetic individuals.

Afreen Saif, Narsingh Verma, Shraddha Singh, Sushma S Rapelly, Deep Shikha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Afreen SaifDepartment of Physiology, King George Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Narsingh VermaDepartment of Physiology, King George Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Shraddha SinghDepartment of Physiology, King George Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Sushma S RapellyDepartment of Physiology, King George Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Deep ShikhaDepartment of Physiology, King George Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Diabetes and glaucoma share several common risk factors and pathophysiological similarities. Elevated intraocular pressure, a key pathogenic feature of glaucoma and its progression, has been found to be influenced in diabetic patients. Furthermore, a link between poor glycemic control and increased intraocular pressure has been documented. Given the rising prevalence of diabetes mellitus and its emergence as a new pandemic with widespread effects, it is crucial to thoroughly study its impact on various body systems and implement measures to reduce these adverse effects. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the variation in intraocular pressure and its relationship with different pathogenic risk factors in diabetes mellitus patients to develop effective prevention strategies. Aim: To study the variation in intraocular pressure among the subjects with Type II Diabetes Mellitus Settings and Study Design: This analytical cross-sectional study conducted at KGMU, Ophthalmology OPD. Methods and Materials: Study has been conducted on a total of 140 participants, comprising of 70 Type II DM cases and 70 age, gender-matched controls in 1year duration. Type II DM was confirmed by diagnosis while controls were selected to match in age & gender without diabetes. IOP measurement was done using non-contact tonometry and central corneal thickness was measured by non-contact method using NIDEK CEM-530 specular microscope. Regression analysis was used to assess association between Type II DM and IOP variation. Statistical analysis of the data was done using IBM SPSS Stats 25.0 version with Student t-test, Chi-square test, ANOVA, and Pearson's correlation with 95% CI is used. P <0.05 is considered significant. Result: Significant distinction in IOP between the between cases and control group is observed. And, also more the duration of diabetes with poor glycemic control may lead to raised IOP. Conclusion: The study rules out the risk factors for raised IOP in general & diabetic population. Thus, emphasizing the need for meticulous ocular care in diabetic individuals.

Indexed as

Central corneal thickness (CCT)intraocular Pressure (IOP)non-Contact Tonometry (NCT)type II Diabetes Mellitus

Identifiers

PMID40396057
PMCPMC12088549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.