ReviewJournal of hand and microsurgery2025
Integrating artificial intelligence into orthopedics: Opportunities, challenges, and future directions.
Review in Journal of hand and microsurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Smarter bones: AI & robotics revolutionise orthopedic surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Orthopaedics at crossroads: are we ready for the responsible use of artificial intelligence in research?International orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Digital Transformation in Orthopedics: Can India Leapfrog with Artificial Intelligence, Augmented Reality, and Robotics?Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- Technology Review: The Hidden Influence of AI in Orthopaedic Surgery.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026Review
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Orthopaedics: Clinical Performance, Limitations, and Translational Readiness-A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- AI-induced deskilling in orthopedic surgery: Preserving judgment in the age of intelligent decision support.SICOT-J · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and robotic technologies redefining precision and personalization in orthopedic surgery: a narrative review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Cybersecurity is imperative in robotic arthroplasty.SICOT-J · 2026Article
- Leveraging data to transform surgical outcomes and precision in orthopaedics.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming orthopedics by improving diagnostic accuracy, optimizing surgical planning, and personalizing treatment approaches. This review evaluates the applications of AI in orthopedics, focusing on its impact on patient care, the efficacy of AI methodologies, and challenges in integrating these technologies into clinical practice. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published up to 28 Results: Findings demonstrate AI's effectiveness in areas such as fracture detection and treatment planning, mainly through machine learning and deep learning. AI has improved outcomes in joint reconstruction, spine surgery, and rehabilitation. However, challenges such as data standardization and clinical validation remain. Conclusion: The review highlights AI's potential to revolutionize orthopedic practice, emphasizing the need for ongoing research to overcome barriers to adoption. Future directions should prioritize multi-center clinical trials, enhanced data protocols, and stakeholder collaboration to ensure ethical and effective AI implementation, ultimately improving patient outcomes and care delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.