ArticleGMS journal for medical education2025
Training supported by simulated persons to promote the development of specific communication skills in advance care planning.
Article in GMS journal for medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Advance care planning (ACP) has been conceived to ensure that patients who are unable to consent are treated in consistence with their well-informed, predetermined preferences. At an individual level, standardised conversations are offered by specifically qualified healthcare professionals (ACP facilitators). Internationally, there is considerable variability with regard to ACP qualifications. This article describes how ACP facilitators are trained in role plays employing simulated persons (SPs) in accordance with the standards of two professional societies. Methods: ACP experts developed ten roles in cooperation with an SP coach (director) based on real ACP conversations. The emotional and mental world of the role, ACP-relevant facts such as previous experience in the medical context, and aids for acting were developed, taking into account the central challenges in ACP conversations. To ensure standardisation, the SPs rehearsed in a structured manner and received feedback training. Microteaching techniques were developed for the facilitator training. Results: Feedback skills and openness towards the topics of serious illness, dying and death are required for the SP to be suitable. Since 2017, ACP facilitator training has taken place in small groups of four participants, one SP and one qualified ACP coach. The required framework is described in detail. Conclusion: SP-supported training is a decisive improvement for the teaching and assessment of the highly complex ACP-facilitation skills and attitudes. Planning and implementation place high demands on SP and ACP coaches who also require specific qualifications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.