ArticleGMS journal for medical education2025
Representation of gender and people of color among healthcare professionals in medical comics - a document analysis.
Article in GMS journal for medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Medical teaching uses medical comics, which are combinations of images and text that depict content from everyday life in the healthcare sector. Over- or under-representation of certain people in certain roles can convey subject-specific role models and stereotypes that can influence individual training pathways. This study examines the proportion of genders and people of colour represented in comic characters, the professional roles to which they can be assigned, and the share of speech they are given. Method: The analysis included 995 German-language comics from anthologies and textbook series, with 2688 depicted characters from the period between 2002 and 2019. Criteria for categorizing roles, read gender and people of color were developed iteratively. The evaluation was carried out in a descriptive manner. Results: In the overall evaluation, the quantitatively dominant read gender was male in the roles examined (55%-88%), with especially high representation in the physician's role (88%). Only the nursing staff were predominantly female (75%). The proportion of people of color in the roles analyzed was negligible (0-2%). The share of speech did not differ. Discussion: Medical comics used in teaching should have a balanced gender ratio, consciously depict people of color and take demographic conditions into account. This should help to create an environment in which students base their career choices on their personal skills and goals rather than on aspects such as gender or identity as people of color.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.