Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40395956›Full record

ArticleGMS journal for medical education2025

Medical students' perception of supervision in MedUniVienna's structured internal medicine and surgery clerkship program: Subject-specific differences and clerkship sequence effects.

Angelika Hofhansl, Gerhard Zlabinger, Lena Bach, Josefine Röhrs, Anna-Maria Mayer, Anita Rieder, Michaela Wagner-Menghin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GMS journal for medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Alternative evaluation methods in medical education.GMS journal for medical education · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Angelika HofhanslMedical University of Vienna, Teaching Center, Vienna, Austria.
Gerhard ZlabingerMedical University of Vienna, Center for Public Health, Vienna, Austria.
Lena BachMedical University of Vienna, Teaching Center, Vienna, Austria.
Josefine RöhrsMedical University of Vienna, Teaching Center, Vienna, Austria.
Anna-Maria MayerCatholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Faculty of Empirical Educational Sciences, Eichstätt, Germany.
Anita RiederMedical University of Vienna, Center for Public Health, Vienna, Austria.
Michaela Wagner-MenghinMedical University of Vienna, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Clinical Division for Social Psychiatry, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Clerkships for supervised learning of clinical skills are part of modern medical curricula. The availability of clerkship placements in clinics and the provision of competent supervision are essential for effective work-based learning. The scheduling of compulsory and elective work-based learning opportunities for undergraduate medical students (UGMS), especially when their numbers are high, results in varying clerkship sequences, which can influence career plans and examination outcomes. The effect of different clerkship sequences on students' impressions of clinical supervision remains unclear. Therefore, this study describes subject-specific differences in students' perceptions of clinical supervision during surgical (SC) and internal medicine (IMC) clerkships and addresses the impact of varying clerkship sequences and increasing clinical experience thereon. Method: In this survey, 1,017 final-year students at the Medical University of Vienna (from 2015 to 2019) retrospectively evaluated the quality of supervision they received during the SC and IMC using a newly piloted questionnaire on supervisory roles. Results: Students described their supervisors as less likely to exercise the roles of gatekeeper/safeguarding, training, and mentoring during the SC than during the IMC. During IMC, the supervisory activities received most often were to ensure patient and trainee safety, whereas during SC, it was to ensure trainee safety and to teach techniques and procedures. Ensuring an appropriate level of clinical duty was the third highest priority in both clerkships. Students' general clinical experience influenced how they perceived the supervision, with students completing SC later in their pathway reporting having received similar levels of supervision in both clerkships. Conclusions: Supervision experiences during the first clerkship appear to shape students' expectations of subsequent supervision. Providing additional support to foster a strong supervisory relationship, tailored to meet the specific supervision needs of UGMS newly entering year 6, could benefit both supervisors and students.

Indexed as

Clinical ClerkshipGeneral SurgeryInternal MedicinePerceptionStudents, MedicalAdultAustriaClinical CompetenceCurriculumEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesSurveys and Questionnairesclinical supervisiongeneral clinical experiencemedical educationstudents’ perspectiveundergraduate studentsworkplace-based learning

Identifiers

PMID40395956
PMCPMC12086254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.