ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2025
Impact of a multi-step testing algorithm on hospital-onset
Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Patients' Voice inmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the impact of implementing a multi-step Design: Retrospective pre-intervention/post-intervention study. Setting: Two academic hospitals in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Methods: In the pre-intervention period, a standalone polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was used for diagnosing CDI. In the post-intervention period, positive PCR assays were reflexed to a glutamate dehydrogenase antigen test and an enzyme immunoassay for toxin A/B. Results: The implementation of a multi-step testing algorithm resulted in a significant reduction in HO-CDI cases per 10,000 patient days from 5.92 to 2.36 ( Conclusions: The multi-step testing algorithm significantly reduced HO-CDI rates without compromising clinical outcomes. The study supports the use of a multi-step CDI testing algorithm to assist healthcare providers with CDI management decisions and potentially to reduce financial penalties burdened on healthcare systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.