ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2025
Investigation of potential prognostic biomarkers for colorectal cancer.
Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Role of telomere maintenance genes as a predictive biomarker for colorectal cancer immunotherapy response and prognosis.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related death. Since CRC is largely asymptomatic until the alert features develop to an advanced stage, implementation of a screening program is important to reduce cancer morbidity and mortality. Current screening methods have significant limitations. Material and methods: CRC-related microarray datasets were collected from the GEO database and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified. Next, Venn analysis, functional enrichment analysis, protein interaction network (PPI) analysis, and survival analysis were performed. Results: A total of 5267 and 4233 DEGs were identified in two datasets (GSE20916, GSE33133). The intersection of up-regulated genes in the two datasets was obtained by Venn Analysis as 1058 DEGs. Among the 1058 genes, 992 genes with survival and clinical information in TCGA were screened. Eleven DEGs were identified as potential prognostic markers. Model results show that the time period with the most obvious prognostic effect is 5 years, and the AUC value is the highest. ROC curve results are consistent with the model results of the survival analysis. The survival curve showed that LRRC8A, PCAT6, PLA2G15, SRD5A1, T1GD1 may be oncogenes, and DSN1, ERI1, EIT1, GLMN, MAPKAPK, NOP14 may be tumor suppressor genes. Conclusions: This study discovers novel prognostic markers through Cox regression and survival analysis, and provides a theoretical basis for the treatment of CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.