Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40395882›Full record

ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2025

Evaluation of pain during diagnostic and surgical minihysteroscopy under local anesthesia.

Adrian Nowak, Karolina Chmaj-Wierzchowska, Małgorzata Kampioni, Adam Malinger, Maciej Wilczak

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07463638 (Effect of Mindfulness Intervention Based on Virtual Reality Technology on Anxiety and Pain in Minimally Invasive Vascular Surgery Under Local Anesthesia), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07463638 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Mindfulness Intervention Based on Virtual Reality Technology on Anxiety and Pain in Minimally Invasive Vascular Surgery Under Local Anesthesia: a Single-center, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorTongji HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled160ConditionsAnxiety, PainArmsMindfulness intervention based on virtual reality technology
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adrian NowakDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Karolina Chmaj-WierzchowskaDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Małgorzata KampioniDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Adam MalingerDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Maciej WilczakDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Hysteroscopy is currently considered the gold standard for the diagnosis and treatment of lesions in the uterine cavity and cervical canal. Currently, smaller diameter hysteroscopes are used, which enable the procedure to be performed without general anesthesia. Despite the use of smaller operating tools, some patients report pain. Material and methods: The study included 142 patients who were divided into two groups: diagnostic hysteroscopy (86) and surgical hysteroscopy (56). Before the start of the procedure, ketoprofen intravenously and lignocaine paracervically were administered to the patient. The level of pain was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS). Results: The average intensity of pain during the procedure in both groups was rated at 3 points (3.03 ±2.25 points). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (VAS score 2.85 ±2.15 vs. 3.3 ±2.38). However, it was noted that as the duration of the procedure increased (regardless of the type), the level of pain experienced increased. Conclusions: Minihysteroscopy under local, paracervical anesthesia using lignocaine, with prior administration (approximately 30 min before surgery) of 100 mg ketoprofen, seems to be an optimal approach for perioperative pain management. The results of the study suggest that hysteroscopes with a smaller diameter and paracervical block can be successfully used in outpatient medical practice.

Indexed as

hysteroscopyketoprofenlignocaineparacervical anesthesiavisual analog scale

Identifiers

PMID40395882
PMCPMC12087335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.