ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2025
Evaluation of pain during diagnostic and surgical minihysteroscopy under local anesthesia.
Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07463638 (Effect of Mindfulness Intervention Based on Virtual Reality Technology on Anxiety and Pain in Minimally Invasive Vascular Surgery Under Local Anesthesia), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Mindfulness Intervention Based on Virtual Reality Technology on Anxiety and Pain in Minimally Invasive Vascular Surgery Under Local Anesthesia: a Single-center, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pain determinants during office hysteroscopy: Insights from clinical and procedural factors: A nine-year prospective cohort study.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Assessment of Pain Complaints and Perioperative and Delayed Complications of Hysteroscopy Performed Under Local Anesthesia-A Retrospective Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Pain During Hysteroscopy Under Local Anesthesia, Including the Stages of the Procedure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Hysteroscopy is currently considered the gold standard for the diagnosis and treatment of lesions in the uterine cavity and cervical canal. Currently, smaller diameter hysteroscopes are used, which enable the procedure to be performed without general anesthesia. Despite the use of smaller operating tools, some patients report pain. Material and methods: The study included 142 patients who were divided into two groups: diagnostic hysteroscopy (86) and surgical hysteroscopy (56). Before the start of the procedure, ketoprofen intravenously and lignocaine paracervically were administered to the patient. The level of pain was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS). Results: The average intensity of pain during the procedure in both groups was rated at 3 points (3.03 ±2.25 points). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (VAS score 2.85 ±2.15 vs. 3.3 ±2.38). However, it was noted that as the duration of the procedure increased (regardless of the type), the level of pain experienced increased. Conclusions: Minihysteroscopy under local, paracervical anesthesia using lignocaine, with prior administration (approximately 30 min before surgery) of 100 mg ketoprofen, seems to be an optimal approach for perioperative pain management. The results of the study suggest that hysteroscopes with a smaller diameter and paracervical block can be successfully used in outpatient medical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.