Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40395843›Full record

ArticleBio-protocol2025

Protocol for Inoculation of PGPR

Girija Somna, Sonal Sangwan, Chithradevi Baskar, Kavya Bakka, Dinakar Challabathula

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bio-protocol, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Girija SomnaDepartment of Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, Central University of Tamil Nadu, Thiruvarur, India.
Sonal SangwanDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Integrative Biology, Central University of Tamil Nadu, Thiruvarur, India.
Chithradevi BaskarDepartment of Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, Central University of Tamil Nadu, Thiruvarur, India.
Kavya BakkaDepartment of Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, Central University of Tamil Nadu, Thiruvarur, India.
Dinakar ChallabathulaDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Integrative Biology, Central University of Tamil Nadu, Thiruvarur, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) can be used as biofertilizers to enhance crop growth for better yield and soil fertility restoration. PGPR possesses certain traits such as nutrient solubilization, phytohormone production, and production of key enzymes for improved crop growth. These traits are also important for inhibiting the growth of plant root pathogens, improving root development, and conferring stress tolerance. However, the mere presence of PGPR traits in isolated bacteria may not directly reflect an improvement in plant growth, warranting researchers to evaluate phenotypic and physiological changes upon inoculation. The current manuscript provides a detailed step-by-step procedure for inoculating the PGPR

Indexed as

BiofertilizersPlant growth–promoting rhizobacteriaRiceRoot growthSeedlingsSeedsTomato

Identifiers

PMID40395843
PMCPMC12086340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.