Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40395721›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law2025

Effects of dehumanization and disgust-eliciting language on attitudes toward immigration: a sentiment analysis of Twitter data.

Katherine S Wahrer, Cynthia J Najdowski, John V Passarelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katherine S WahrerSchool of Criminal Justice, University at Albany, State University at New York, Albany, NY, USA.
Cynthia J NajdowskiDepartment of Psychology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA.
John V PassarelliIndependent researcher, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attitudes towards immigration may be influenced by dehumanization and disgust: The more people dehumanize immigrants and the more disgusted they feel, the more negative their attitudes toward immigrants tend to be. Despite the fact that the majority of U.S. adults are on social media, however, little is known about how exposure to social media that links dehumanization, disgust and immigration influences users' attitudes on this issue over time. We used Twitter data, machine learning and sentiment analysis to explore this question. Results showed that dehumanizing and/or disgust-eliciting language appeared in 66% of sampled immigration-relevant tweets. Surprisingly, exposure to both types of language in such tweets related to increases in positive sentiment about immigration over time. There was evidence of Granger-causality only for dehumanizing language, however, and only when controlling for communicators' political affiliation. These findings suggest social media exposure may influence public attitudes toward immigration in unexpected ways.

Indexed as

Attitudesdehumanizationdisgustimmigrationsentiment analysissocial mediaTwitter

Identifiers

PMID40395721
PMCPMC12090904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.