ArticlePsychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law2025
Effects of dehumanization and disgust-eliciting language on attitudes toward immigration: a sentiment analysis of Twitter data.
Article in Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Attitudes towards immigration may be influenced by dehumanization and disgust: The more people dehumanize immigrants and the more disgusted they feel, the more negative their attitudes toward immigrants tend to be. Despite the fact that the majority of U.S. adults are on social media, however, little is known about how exposure to social media that links dehumanization, disgust and immigration influences users' attitudes on this issue over time. We used Twitter data, machine learning and sentiment analysis to explore this question. Results showed that dehumanizing and/or disgust-eliciting language appeared in 66% of sampled immigration-relevant tweets. Surprisingly, exposure to both types of language in such tweets related to increases in positive sentiment about immigration over time. There was evidence of Granger-causality only for dehumanizing language, however, and only when controlling for communicators' political affiliation. These findings suggest social media exposure may influence public attitudes toward immigration in unexpected ways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.