Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40395688›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2025

Adversarial denoising of EEG signals: a comparative analysis of standard GAN and WGAN-GP approaches.

Imad Eddine Tibermacine, Samuele Russo, Francesco Citeroni, Giuseppe Mancini, Abdelaziz Rabehi, Amal H Alharbi, El-Sayed M El-Kenawy, Christian Napoli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Imad Eddine TibermacineDepartment of Computer, Automation and Management Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Samuele RussoDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Francesco CiteroniDepartment of Computer, Automation and Management Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe ManciniDepartment of Computer, Automation and Management Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Abdelaziz RabehiTelecommunications and Smart Systems Laboratory, University of Djelfa, Djelfa, Algeria.
Amal H AlharbiDepartment of Computer Sciences, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
El-Sayed M El-KenawySchool of ICT, Faculty of Engineering, Design and Information & Communications Technology (EDICT), Bahrain Polytechnic, Isa Town, Bahrain.
Christian NapoliDepartment of Computer, Automation and Management Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Electroencephalography (EEG) signals frequently contain substantial noise and interference, which can obscure clinically and scientifically relevant features. Traditional denoising approaches, such as linear filtering or wavelet thresholding, often struggle with nonlinear or time-varying artifacts. In response, the present study explores a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) framework to enhance EEG signal quality, focusing on two variants: a conventional GAN model and a Wasserstein GAN with Gradient Penalty (WGAN-GP). Methods: Data were obtained from two distinct EEG datasets: a "healthy" set of 64-channel recordings collected during various motor/imagery tasks, and an "unhealthy" set of 18-channel recordings from individuals with orthopedic impairments. Both datasets underwent comprehensive preprocessing, including band-pass filtering (8-30 Hz), channel standardization, and artifact trimming. The training stage involved adversarial learning, in which a generator sought to reconstruct clean EEG signals while a discriminator (or critic in the case of WGAN-GP) attempted to distinguish between real and generated signals. The model evaluation was conducted using quantitative metrics such as signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), correlation coefficient, mutual information, and dynamic time warping (DTW) distance. Results: Experimental findings indicate that adversarial learning substantially improves EEG signal fidelity across multiple quantitative metrics. Specifically, WGAN-GP achieved an SNR of up to 14.47 dB (compared to 12.37 dB for the standard GAN) and exhibited greater training stability, as evidenced by consistently lower relative root mean squared error (RRMSE) values. In contrast, the conventional GAN model excelled in preserving finer signal details, reflected in a PSNR of 19.28 dB and a correlation coefficient exceeding 0.90 in several recordings. Both adversarial frameworks outperformed classical wavelet-based thresholding and linear filtering methods, demonstrating superior adaptability to nonlinear distortions and dynamic interference patterns in EEG time-series data. Discussion: By systematically comparing standard GAN and WGAN-GP architectures, this study highlights a practical trade-off between aggressive noise suppression and high-fidelity signal reconstruction. The demonstrated improvements in signal quality underscore the promise of adversarially trained models for applications ranging from basic neuroscience research to real-time brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) in clinical or consumer-grade settings. The results further suggest that GAN-based frameworks can be easily scaled to next-generation wireless networks and complex electrophysiological datasets, offering robust and dynamic solutions to long-standing challenges in EEG denoising.

Indexed as

brain-computer interfacedeep learningEEG denoisinggenerative adversarial networkWasserstein GAN

Identifiers

PMID40395688
PMCPMC12089060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.