ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Outcomes Following Implantation With Mesh Suture: A Registry of 1111 Patients.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early outcomes of umbilical hernia repair with mesh suture.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
- Early outcomes following Duramesh™ implantation for abdominal wall closure: the Croydon experience.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Early outcomes of contaminated midline incisional hernia repair with mesh suture.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Article
- A Narrative Review of Mesh Suture in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: Biomechanics, Early Outcomes, and Proposed Clinical Algorithm.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mesh suture is a novel suture design intended to distribute pressure at the suture-tissue interface, potentially reducing suture pull-through and repair failures. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of mesh suture closures across surgical indications and assess early outcomes, with emphasis on abdominal wall closure. Methods: A registry was created using institutional implant logs from January 2023 to July 2024 across an integrated healthcare system. A retrospective chart review collected demographics, surgical details, and complications. Results: In total, 1111 patients received mesh suture by 86 surgeons. Most cases involved full-thickness abdominal wall closures (88.2%). Further analysis focused on abdominal wall closures without planar mesh (N = 862). The 90-day surgical site infection rate was 9.0%, and the surgical site event rate was 11.8%. There were 9 (1.0%) fascial dehiscence events, 3 (0.3%) chronic draining sinuses, and 2 (0.2%) enterocutaneous fistulae. The 90-day readmission and reoperation rates were 7.0% and 7.5%, respectively. The hernia formation rate was 4.8%. On univariate analysis, American Society of Anesthesiology class, wound class, and diabetes were significantly associated with major complications ( Conclusions: Mesh suture appears versatile and user-friendly across specialties and indications. Early outcomes are encouraging; however, prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed to further evaluate long-term performance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.