Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40395658›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal open2025

Sex differences in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Nertila Zylyftari, Mads Wissenberg, Filip Gnesin, Amalie Lykkemark Møller, Elisabeth Helen Anna Mills, Sidsel G Møller, Britta Jensen, Kristian Bundgaard Ringgren, Hanno L Tan, Fredrik Folke and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Lessons from the finish line: understanding cardiac arrest in endurance racing.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Nertila ZylyftariDepartment of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte Hospitalsvej 6, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8562-6760
Mads WissenbergDepartment of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte Hospitalsvej 6, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark.
Filip GnesinDepartment of Cardiology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Dyrehavevej 29, 3400 Hillerød, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3566-5155
Amalie Lykkemark MøllerDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Elisabeth Helen Anna MillsDepartment of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark.
Sidsel G MøllerCopenhagen Emergency Medical Services, Telegrafvej 5, 2750 Ballerup, Denmark.
Britta JensenPublic Health and Epidemiology, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Selma Lagerløfs Vej 249, 9260 Gistrup, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2026-6458
Kristian Bundgaard RinggrenDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark.
Hanno L TanDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Fredrik FolkeDepartment of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte Hospitalsvej 6, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2284-7857
Gunnar GislasonDepartment of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte Hospitalsvej 6, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0548-402X
Christian Torp- PedersenDepartment of Cardiology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Dyrehavevej 29, 3400 Hillerød, Denmark.
Christina Ji-Young LeeDepartment of Cardiology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Dyrehavevej 29, 3400 Hillerød, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: The impact of resuscitation care initiatives on sex-differences in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival remains unclear. We aim to examine sex-differences in characteristics and survival. Methods and results: This Danish register-based study (2001-2020) included adult patients with a presumed cardiac cause of arrest. Temporal trends in survival were stratified by sex and subgroups: (i) bystander-witnessed status; (ii) bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); (iii) initial shockable heart rhythm; and age groups of <50, 50-75, and >75 years. To examine the association between sex and survival, we conducted adjusted logistic regression analyses. Among 50 066 OHCAs, women represented 34%. Women were older, had more chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and lower prevalence of cardiovascular and cardiometabolic conditions than men. Women also had more OHCA at home (83.4 vs. 74.1%), fewer witnessed arrests (48.1 vs. 52.9%), half the probability of initial shockable heart rhythm (13.6 vs. 27.6%), and similar rates of receiving bystander-CPR. Survival rates improved over time for both sexes, but men had higher 30-day survival than women, even in subgroup and adjusted analyses [odds ratios (OR): 1.29; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.15-1.45, Conclusion: Despite increases in 30-day survival for both sexes, women consistently had lower survival rates than men. Sex-differences were larger among those aged 50-75 years or with bystander witnessed arrests, but smaller in the subset of patients with an initial shockable heart rhythm.

Indexed as

30-day survivalESCAPE-NETFemale sexOut-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA)PARQ-COSTWomen

Identifiers

PMID40395658
PMCPMC12089750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.