ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2025
Triaging Clients at Risk of Disengagement from HIV Care: Application of a Predictive Model to Clinical Trial Data in South Africa.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Evaluation of a Simplified Clinical Algorithm for Identifying Patients Eligible for Immediate Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV
Randomized Evaluation of a Revised, Simplified Clinical Algorithm for Identifying Patients Eligible for Immediate Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV (SLATEII)
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evaluating predictive performance, validity, and applicability of machine learning models for predicting HIV treatment interruption: a systematic review.BMC global and public health · 2025Pooled it
- Age, sex-and what else? Rethinking priorities to close gaps in the HIV care cascade.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2026Article
- Patterns of engagement in care during clients' first 12 months after HIV treatment initiation in Zambia: a retrospective cohort analysis using routinely collected data.BMJ global health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To reach South Africa's targets for HIV treatment and viral suppression, retention on antiretroviral therapy (ART) must increase. Here, we aim to successfully identify ART clients at risk of loss from care prior to disengagement. Patients and Methods: We applied a previously developed machine learning and predictive modelling algorithm (PREDICT) to ART client data from SLATE I and II trials. The primary outcome was interruption in treatment (IIT), defined as missing the next scheduled clinic visit by >28 days. We tested two risk triaging approaches: 1) threshold approach classifying individuals into low, moderate, or high risk of IIT; and 2) archetype approach identifying subgroups with characteristics associated with risk of ITT. We report associations between risk category groups and subsequent IIT at the next scheduled visit using crude risk differences and relative risks with 95% confidence intervals. Results: SLATE datasets included 7199 client visits for 1193 clients over ≤14 months of follow-up. The threshold approach consistently and accurately assigned levels of IIT risk for multiple stages of the care cascade. The archetype approach identified several subgroups at increased risk of IIT, including those late to previous appointments, returning after a period of disengagement, living alone or without a treatment supporter. Behavioural elements of the archetypes tended to drive the risk of treatment interruption more consistently than demographics; eg adolescent boys/young men who attended visits on time experienced the lowest rates of treatment interruption (10% PREDICT datasets; 7% SLATE datasets), while adolescent boys/young men returning after previously disengaging had the highest rates of subsequent treatment interruption (31% PREDICT datasets; 40% SLATE datasets). Conclusion: Routinely collected medical record data can be combined with basic demographic and socioeconomic data to assess individual risk of future treatment disengagement. This approach offers an opportunity to prevent disengagement from HIV care, rather than responding only after it has occurred. Trial Registration: SLATE I trial: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02891135, registered September 1, 2016. First participant enrolled March 6, 2017, in South Africa and July 13, 2017, in Kenya. SLATE II trial: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03315013, registered 19 October 2017. First participant enrolled 14 March 2018.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.