Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40395576›Full record

ArticleIndian dermatology online journal

A Real-World Study of Tofacitinib in Indian Patients with Refractory Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis, its Economic Considerations and Immunological Rationale.

Kabir Sardana, Savitha Sharath, Sumitra Kumari Meena, Ananta Khurana, Bhawuk Dhir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian dermatology online journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kabir SardanaDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Institute and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1757-3406
Savitha SharathDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Institute and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Sumitra Kumari MeenaDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Institute and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Ananta KhuranaDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Institute and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Bhawuk DhirDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Institute and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The response of atopic dermatitis (AD) to different biologics and JAK inhibitors (JAKibs) is variable due to the varied immunological endotypes of AD. Aim and Objectives: To assess the effectiveness and adverse effect profile of tofacitinib in recalcitrant, moderate-to-severe AD patients and to compare the cost of therapy of tofacitinib with dupilumab. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed records of moderate to severe AD treated with tofacitinib monotherapy. The response to tofacitinib was assessed using clinical scores including Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD), and Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at 4 weeks and 8 weeks of treatment. We also analyzed the duration of remission and time after which recurrences were seen after stopping tofacitinib. The cost of tofacitinib was compared with dupilumab. Results: Twelve cases of recalcitrant moderate-severe AD who had failed systemic agents [oral corticosteroids (n = 7), cyclosporine (n = 4), and azathioprine (n = 2)] were treated with tofacitinib monotherapy. There was a statistically significant reduction in SCORAD, EASI, and NRS scores at 4 weeks and 8 weeks of tofacitinib therapy [mean at baseline: 4 weeks: 8 weeks = SCORAD- 43.54: 22.74: 11.87 ( Limitations: Small sample size and lack of tissue cytokines analysis pre- and post-treatment. Conclusion: Tofacitinib (pan JAK inhibitor) inhibits T helper 2 (Th2), Th1, Th17, and Th22 cell lines, and thus has potential for refractory AD. There is a need to generate tissue-based cytokine expression data in Indian patients with AD.

Indexed as

Atopic dermatitiscyclosporinedupilumabEASIefficacyJAK inhibitorsTh1Th17Th2Th22tofacitinib

Identifiers

PMID40395576
PMCPMC12088487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.