ArticleIndian dermatology online journal
A Real-World Study of Tofacitinib in Indian Patients with Refractory Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis, its Economic Considerations and Immunological Rationale.
Article in Indian dermatology online journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tofacitinib: New drug in the therapeutic armamentarium in ocular inflammation.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Authors' Response to Comment on published article "A Real-World Study of Tofacitinib in Indian Patients with Refractory Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis, its Economic Considerations and Immunological Rationale".Indian dermatology online journal · 2026Article
- Comment on published article "A Real-World Study of Tofacitinib in Indian Patients with Refractory Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis, its Economic Considerations and Immunological Rationale".Indian dermatology online journal · 2026Article
- Targeting the JAK/STAT pathway in atopic dermatitis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Immune-mediated interactions between sarcopenia and atherosclerosis in aging.Immunity & ageing : I & A · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The response of atopic dermatitis (AD) to different biologics and JAK inhibitors (JAKibs) is variable due to the varied immunological endotypes of AD. Aim and Objectives: To assess the effectiveness and adverse effect profile of tofacitinib in recalcitrant, moderate-to-severe AD patients and to compare the cost of therapy of tofacitinib with dupilumab. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed records of moderate to severe AD treated with tofacitinib monotherapy. The response to tofacitinib was assessed using clinical scores including Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD), and Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at 4 weeks and 8 weeks of treatment. We also analyzed the duration of remission and time after which recurrences were seen after stopping tofacitinib. The cost of tofacitinib was compared with dupilumab. Results: Twelve cases of recalcitrant moderate-severe AD who had failed systemic agents [oral corticosteroids (n = 7), cyclosporine (n = 4), and azathioprine (n = 2)] were treated with tofacitinib monotherapy. There was a statistically significant reduction in SCORAD, EASI, and NRS scores at 4 weeks and 8 weeks of tofacitinib therapy [mean at baseline: 4 weeks: 8 weeks = SCORAD- 43.54: 22.74: 11.87 ( Limitations: Small sample size and lack of tissue cytokines analysis pre- and post-treatment. Conclusion: Tofacitinib (pan JAK inhibitor) inhibits T helper 2 (Th2), Th1, Th17, and Th22 cell lines, and thus has potential for refractory AD. There is a need to generate tissue-based cytokine expression data in Indian patients with AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.