Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40395556›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2025

Case Report: A prenatal case with sex discordance between non-invasive prenatal testing and fetal genetic testings due to maternal rare chromosome karyotype.

Guoxing Zhong, Jiajia Wu, Zeyan Zhong, Dina Chen, Zhiyang Guan, Shaohui Huang, Jianhong Chen

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Guoxing Zhong *Department of Medical Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis, Huizhou First Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital, Huizhou, Guangdong, China.
Jiajia Wu *Department of Medical Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis, Huizhou First Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital, Huizhou, Guangdong, China.
Zeyan ZhongDepartment of Medical Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis, Huizhou First Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital, Huizhou, Guangdong, China.
Dina ChenDepartment of Medical Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis, Huizhou First Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital, Huizhou, Guangdong, China.
Zhiyang GuanDepartment of Medical Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis, Huizhou First Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital, Huizhou, Guangdong, China.
Shaohui HuangDepartment of Medical Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis, Huizhou First Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital, Huizhou, Guangdong, China.
Jianhong ChenDepartment of Medical Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis, Huizhou First Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital, Huizhou, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), which made use of cell-free DNA (cffDNA) in maternal blood, was currently being applied all over the world for the detection of common chromosome abnormalities. It had relatively high sensitivity and specificity. Nevertheless, studies demonstrated that false positive results happened in 0.3% of the cases due to several factors. These factors included confined placental mosaicism, maternal mosaicism, maternal transfusions, maternal malignancy, vanishing twins and maternal chromosomal abnormalities. Case report: We presented a case of a 27-year-old healthy woman, who had a high risk of trisomy 21 syndrome in first-trimester serum screening at 12 gestational weeks. The result of NIPT indicated a high risk of klinefelter syndrome (47, XXY) at 15 weeks gestation. Subsequently, amniocentesis revealed a normal female fetus karyotype (46, XX) at 18 weeks gestation. Discordant sex chromosome results emerged. Eventually, it was discovered that there was a rare maternal karyotype 46,X,der(X)t (X; Y) (p22.3; q11.2), which led to the sex discrepancy between the NIPT and the fetal prenatal diagnostic results. Conclusion: We presented a case in which there was a sex discrepancy between NIPT and fetal genetic testing due to a rare chromosome karyotype in the mother. NIPT was merely a prenatal screening test. Consequently, patients who had a screen-positive result for a chromosomal anomaly following NIPT ought to be properly counselled and advised to undergo an invasive diagnostic procedure for confirmation.

Indexed as

breakpointcase reportcffDNACNV-seqNIPT

Identifiers

PMID40395556
PMCPMC12089056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.