ArticleBioinformatics advances2025
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- In silico analysis of CSF2RB from cancer genomic databases reveals a heterogeneous role in different breast cancer subtypes.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation: The National Cancer Institute Genomic Data Commons (GDC) provides controlled access to sequencing data from thousands of subjects, enabling large-scale study of impactful genetic alterations such as simple and complex germline and structural variants. However, efficient analysis requires significant computational resources and expertise, especially when calling variants from raw sequence reads. To solve these problems, we developed Results: Here, we demonstrate population-scale genomic and transcriptomic analyses with minimal compute burden using Availability and implementation:
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.