ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2025
Computational analysis of learning in young and ageing brains.
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Learning and memory are fundamental processes of the brain which are essential for acquiring and storing information. However, with ageing the brain undergoes significant changes leading to age-related cognitive decline. Although there are numerous studies on computational models and approaches which aim to mimic the learning process of the brain, they often concentrate on generic neural function exhibiting the potential need for models that address age-related changes in learning. In this paper, we present a computational analysis focusing on the differences in learning between young and old brains. Using a bipartite graph as an artificial neural network to model the synaptic connections, we simulate the learning processes of young and older brains by applying distinct biologically inspired synaptic weight update rules. Our results demonstrate the quicker learning ability of young brains compared to older ones, consistent with biological observations. Our model effectively mimics the fundamental mechanisms of the brain related to the speed of learning and reveals key insights on memory consolidation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.